1 in 2,500 risk

[nourdalal]

I read a reply of a doctor regarding HIV risk of oral sex with swallowing ejaculation is 1 in 2,500 same rate as in anal sex? Is it true? He also point out that there is a risk especially if the person has a high viral load. He said that in the studies conducted the reason why there are few infected is that because most of the participants have low viral load and under medication. unlike those person who are positive and not yet tested.

[nourdalal]

I'm sorry I'm just bothered with what I've read straight from the mouth of a doctor. Iraq984 I think HIV is not rare in Saudi. I think their goverment is just hiding the true statistics. There are many arabs here who are sex addicts. Sorry for posting too much. I'm just don't know what to do. I think this is the most problematic experience I've ever experience.

[nursegirl6572]

I second what Teak said:

* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
    * After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
    * Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
    * Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ALREADY!

[Teak]

* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
    * After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
    * Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
    * Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.