* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Sorry rephrase that : would saliva do anything to blood that is infected
Ok so from the gums into the mouth is considered outside of it's host? In my situation would the saliva do anything to potentially infect blood?
HIV is unable to reproduce outside its living host (unlike many bacteria or fungi, which may do so under suitable conditions), except under laboratory conditions; therefore, it does not spread or maintain infectiousness outside its host.
HIV is transmitted by;
Unprotected penetrative anal and/or vaginal sex
Sharing works with other IV drug users
Mother to child
Ok thank you, no risk... But on a separate note why is it considered no risk when blood is coming in contact with and open wound.
Dr's answers in the expert forum, personal research/reading and common knowledge.
So you're basing your answers on?
Dr's answer questions in the HIV Expert forum, there is a fee to pay to post to them.
Thank you. Vance if I may are you a doctor or specialist on HIV?
Ok sorry if I'm becoming an annoyance, it's just the stress is killing me. Please could you just clear up these two questions for me:
1. Have you ever seen a scenario like this change to positive after the 4 week mark
2. If my symptoms were being caused due to ARS would I have tested positive at 4 weeks
I have answered several times.
I'm not starting a confrontation all I am asking is in my situation do I have to worry about potential exposure. It he stress is destroying me.
I can't make you believe something that has never happened, so you can believe what you want.
Maybe not a theory but that "100% proved" concept of no transmission through kiss doesn't include potentially HIV+ blood in the scenario?
HIV is transmitted through blood, and if blood is present in a deep kiss between individuals with bleeding gums/wounds and one of those individuals is HIV+ is transmission not possible?
What theory? How is fact that no one has gotten HIV from kissing a theory?
Fair reasoning I just hope that theory takes into consideration the blood present in the kiss? Just one last curiosity. I'm assuming you have expertise in this area but with the symptoms I'm presenting (above) and with my negative INSTI test at 4 weeks
1. Have you ever seen a scenario like this change to positive after the 4 week mark
2. If my symptoms were being caused due to ARS would I have tested positive at 4 weeks
No. You are not going to be the 1st person in 40+ years of HIV to get HIV from kissing.
Yes ofcourse. Saliva has the particulars to immunize the HIV, but does this theory still stand if blood was envolved from (as mentioned) my bleeding gums? Worst case scenario, the guy was HIV+ and also had some sort of wound or condition that would present blood into the kiss? Would I be exposed to infection?
No one has ever gotten HIV from kissing. Saliva inactivates the virus.
Thank you for your swift response. When you say no risk can you justify with a theory or reason please?