Final post

[Too_worried]

Ok so if u remember at all i posted a while ago about oral risk and such, and i just have a few final questions. So its been 2 months give or take since my risky expousure, and my doctor did say oral even without climax was a risk. And im wondering, if i get tested at 2 months how accurate will it be? i plan on getting tested at 3 months as well,  but does testing at 2 months have a good accurcy? Also i know that symptoms arent really worth jack for diagnoising, but ive had this annoying low grade fever for 2 months, as far as i know thats too long to be  early hiv related, right?(all the info i get about it is conflicting) I just got really worred after reading that constent low grade fever is a symptom, please dont get mad at me for posting, i just want some feed back.

[Teak]

You want people to spend money/waste money for a no-risk situation? Who are you trying to help.

[Teak]

LOL, you called the hotline that are people like yourself that read from an unupdated book that give you information. You were never at risk. Now move on.

[Too_worried]

sigh, last last post. Sorry teak if i got defensive, im just sleepy, im really not all that worried, i just watned to clairify testing times. Sorry if i wasted your time. im outs.

[Teak]

That's the problem, you don't understand HIV and you have no knowledge of HIV and should not be giving advice on this or any other forum.

[Too_worried]

Guess i lied, THIS is my last post.  I called the hiv and aids hotline, and told the people there my story, they agree it is a risk, though low . Its these peoples jobs to know how hiv is spread and how its not, they get paid to do it.  If my account gets suspended whoop-de-do at least i spoke my mind. People post on here for reassurance and comfort, they are afarid of loosing their lives to a terrible illness, you would think people would be nicer, but ne who im off to go enjoy some life and get tested.

[Teak]

I would think if you understood the transmission of HIV and the studies that have been done on oral sex you would know that oral sex is not a means of HIV transmission. Try reading the studies. By the way the CDC also put kissing as a risk.

[Too_worried]

THANK YOU thats all i wanted.  I wont post on here again since my question has been answered

[Too_worried]

what are u talking about, the cdc dosnt know anything about hiv? i just want to know when i should get tested thats it, this isnt a breach in any rules its not a no risk   situation

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/qa/qa19.htm   i would think the cdc has its facts straight.

[Teak]

That's real assuring coming from someone that doesn't know anything about HIV and how it's transmitted. MOVE ON. You've been reported to MedHelp.

[Too_worried]

Yeah thats what i wana do i just wana know if i should get tested at 2 months  then at 3 or just at three...im not questioning a negitive result or a no-risk...so i just want to know

[Too_worried]

This was a different question i was askingabout testing, the cdc and every doctor ive talked to says oral is a risk...so they lied to me?

[Teak]

* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
    * After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
    * Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
    * Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.