You never had a risk and don't need testing for HIV. There are no tests marketed or sold that will give a conclusive test result earlier than 3 months for anyone that has had a real exposure.
yes 6 weeks is a good indicator according to the sites docs, but according to cdc only 3 mths can be Conclusive...but you are being paranoid.
Thank you for your answers. I understand the risk for HIV transmission during oral sex is virtually non-existent. I, of course, am going to air on the side of caution and get tested again on November 22 (6 weeks).
Let's place aside my risk evaluation for a moment. Would you consider my negative oral rapid test at five weeks to be a very good indication of my actual status? At six weeks?
Insertive oral sex is virtually no risk for HIV.
There is no data on insertive fellatio (when you get oral sex given to you), but the risk is probably almost neglegible.
The HIV seroconversion illness, fever is the most common sign, which occurs in 80-97% of people, sore throat and lymphnodes are the next most common symptoms (40-77% and 44-73%).
This means you are unlikely to be an acute HIV seroconversion illness.
Reference: Oxford Handobook Gentitourinary medicine, HIV and AIDS, first edition.
Insertive oral sex is virtually zero risk for HIV.
There is no data on insertive fellatio (when you get oral sex given to you), but the risk is probably almost neglegible.
The HIV seroconversion illness, fever is the most common sign, which occurs in 80-97% of people, sore throat and lymphnodes are the next most common symptoms (40-77% and 44-73%).
This means you are unlikely to be an acute HIV seroconversion illness.
Reference: Oxford Handobook Gentitourinary medicine, HIV and AIDS, first edition.
This was my only incident, Lanvin, but if I may ask, how can you be sure?
If this was your only incident you never had a risk.