http://www.medhelp.org/posts/HIV---International/Worried/show/1231068?personal_page_id=861869#post_5663711
http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/InSite?page=pr-rr-05&doc=pr-rr-05-05
Comments
Post a Comment
Delete Report 580755_tn?1357673215
by Vance2335, Apr 04, 2011
No incident HIV infections among MSM who practice exclusively oral sex.
Int Conf AIDS 2004 Jul 11-16; 15:(abstract no. WePpC2072)??Balls JE, Evans JL, Dilley J, Osmond D, Shiboski S, Shiboski C, Klausner J, McFarland W, Greenspan D, Page-Shafer K?University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Oral transmission of HIV, reality or fiction? An update
J Campo1, MA Perea1, J del Romero2, J Cano1, V Hernando2, A Bascones1
Oral Diseases (2006) 12, 219–228
AIDS: Volume 16(17) 22 November 2002 pp 2350-2352
Risk of HIV infection attributable to oral sex among men who have sex with men and in the population of men who have sex with men
Page-Shafer, Kimberlya,b; Shiboski, Caroline Hb; Osmond, Dennis Hc; Dilley, Jamesd; McFarland, Willie; Shiboski, Steve Cc; Klausner, Jeffrey De; Balls, Joycea; Greenspan, Deborahb; Greenspan
Page-Shafer K, Veugelers PJ, Moss AR, Strathdee S, Kaldor JM, van Griensven GJ. Sexual risk behavior and risk factors for HIV-1 seroconversion in homosexual men participating in the Tricontinental Seroconverter Study, 1982-1994 [published erratum appears in Am J Epidemiol 1997 15 Dec; 146(12):1076]. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 146:531-542.
Studies which show the fallacy of relying on anecdotal evidence as opposed to carefully controlled study insofar as HIV transmission risk is concerned:
Jenicek M. "Clinical Case Reporting" in Evidence-Based Medicine. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann; 1999:117
Saltzman SP, Stoddard AM, McCusker J, Moon MW, Mayer KH. Reliability of self-reported sexual behavior risk factors for HIV infection in homosexual men. Public Health Rep. 1987 102(6):692–697.Nov–Dec;
Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):339–362.
There is no debate (among experts) about the HIV risks associated with oral sex. The risk is so low that almost nobody who cares for HIV infected patients has ever had a patient believed to have been infected that way. Among experts, it's a semantic issue about using terms like "no risk" and "very low risk". There is no difference between my or Dr. Hook's use of "low risk" and other experts' "no risk".
DR. HANSFIELD
"And oral sex is basically safe sex -- completely safe with respect to HIV and although not zero risk for other STDs, the chance of infection is far lower than for unprotected vaginal or anal sex. Please educate yourself about the real risks. If you stick with oral sex and condom-protected vaginal or anal sex, you have no HIV worries and very little worry about other STDs. " DR HANSFIELD
"I am sure you can find lots of people who belive that HIV is transmitted by oral sex, but you will not find scientific data to support this unrealistic concern..." DR HOOK
"HIV is not spread by touching, masturbation, oral sex or condom protected sex."- DR. HOOK
in the public HIV Prevention forum of MedHelp, TEAK and the other moderators maintain that oral sex in all forms is a zero risk activity. Would you agree with this assessment?
I TOTALLY AGREE / DR GARCIA
Delete Report 580755_tn?1357673215
by Vance2335, Apr 05, 2011
I posted a few days ago and was extremely anxious and nervous about a single episode of unprotected oral sex (receptive and insertive) with no ejaculation. Since I have a great interest in health care, etc. I immediately started reading anything that I could find about HIV and oral sex. I then came here, in which many well educated members helped to calm my fears. Mnay of the members here know A LOT about the risks involving oral sex, so I thought it would be good to share what I have read and been told so far. I will try to source everything as good as I can. What I'm looking for here is everyone's opinions on the topic and if you agree/disagree with what i am posting. I am starting medical school in a few months and really want to have an educated opinion on the topic.
First off, there was a study done in San Francisco that stated that up to 8% of HIV cases could be attributable to oral sex.
-First off, this study is one of the ones that sent me into a panicking frenzy of mild panic attacks and anxiety. I feel this number is so unrealistically high due to the statistics elsewhere.
-Indeed, I have read via a 4 MD round table that this study not only had a low sample size, that many of the patients who stated that they only had oral sex later on admitted to having more high risk exposure behaviour such as unprotected anal sex. In addition, it was used as an example that three of the main cases were atypical oral sex cases (one had major oral ulcers, etc / one had been with a HIV+ partner for years (and pot. more risky behaviours) / and one had had over 1100 counts of unprotected oral from over 42 partners (and once again more risky behaviours potentially). I believe the study only looked at 122 men where 8 were said to be seroconverted via oral sex. It seems this study is one which freaked out the world on oral sex and launched studies as those seen below. IMHO, evidence suggests that this study not only shows how powerful weak research methods can be, but begs the question of how many needless cases of HIV anxiety it has caused. I know I am one of the people who saw this article first (it seems to have the most coverage).