Hiv prévention

[Hazard24]

Hello, I am a young man I am 25 years old. I have had a sexual relationship without penetrating the friction of the two members only with a woman who is unaware of her condition. After 10 weeks, i tested a rapid anti body hiv , the result négative , conclusive résult or no ??

[Hazard24]

Simple inquiry: Are all antibody analyses  be conclusive after 10 weeks, or are they limited to the type of analyses, and whether they are conclusive regardless of the symptoms like joint pain ??

[AnxiousNoMore]

Reread about "unrealistic" in  my advice.

[Chima7]

Symptoms are irrelevant. Only test results and risk factor are used to diagnose HIV.

[Hazard24]

Thanks , but about tests Are all antibody tests  be conclusive after 10 weeks, or are they limited to the type of tests ??

[AnxiousNoMore]

Reread about "unrealistic". You don't have any medical training so it is unrealistic for you to have so much confidence in your science fiction hiv theories. Seek therapy if the only science you believe in is your personal theories.

[Hazard24]

I dont understand

[CurfewX]

You had NO RISK for HIV.  There is no useful purpose in asking about testing for a disease that you cannot possibly have.  Any test you take will be conclusive - and negative - since you were never exposed to HIV.

[mike_no]

I am not sure what are you trying to explain here;

If you didn't have unprotected vaginal intercourse or insert your penis in to a vagina with out using a condom, you do not have to worry about HIV. In that case, a test at any point of time will provide you with a definitive result since there was no risk associated.

If you had an unprotected vaginal exposure, a negative result with an antibody test at 10 months means no infection, the result is conclusive. No further testing is recommended.

[Hazard24]

Thank you for your reply. I'm sorry my english is Bad . I had an unprotected relation but without penetration. After 10 weeks . not 10 months,  10 weeks I tested anti hiv rapid test and the result was negative. Is the result conclusive ?

[AnxiousNoMore]

No penetration = no risk. Move on from hiv and your test was a waste of time.

This answers all of your HIV questions, and if you can think of any more just reread about the 3. You had zero risk therefore  testing is irrelevant to your situation because you had zero risk. HIV is a fragile virus, which is instantly inactivated in air and also in saliva which means it is effectively dead so it can't infect from touching, external rubbing or oral activities. It doesn't matter if you and they were actively bleeding or had cuts at the time either because the HIV is effectively dead.  
Only 3 adult risks are the following:
1. unprotected penetrating vaginal with a penis
2. unprotected penetrating anal sex with a penis
3. sharing needles that you inject with.
The only way to get HIV is if you did one of the 3. The situation you describe is a long way from any of these 3.
Even with blood, lactation, cuts, rashes, burns, etc the air or the saliva does not allow inactivated virus to infect from touching, external rubbing or oral activities. Doctors have calculated the risk from what you describe to be less than that of being hit by a meteor, therefore no one will get HIV from what you did in the next 40 years of your life either. The above HIV science is 40 years old and very well established, so no detail that you can add to your encounter will change it from zero risk.
If you didn't have one of the 3 then you are just worrying about your own hiv theory - which is unrealistic for you to think that can become reality - so you should move on back to your happy life instead.

[mike_no]

If you didn't penetrate, you have nothing to worry as explained above. You didn't need to test.

My apologies for writing 'months' instead of 'weeks', it was an error.

Even for someone with a real risk, a negative at 10 week is conclusive. It rules out HIV infection.

[Hazard24]

Thanks for answering, I really feel comfortable now