Blood to blood is really non-existant. Take a knife and cut open an artery, then find someone who is HIV+ and do the same thing and take those pumping arteries and put them together...then we can talk about risk.
To talk about "what if" is not something we do here and we are getting into the "what if" category.
That is very helpful and quick - mind at rest.
On a purely factual point, when sites etc mentioned blood to blood does that term refer to general cuts, deep cuts or actually an internal blood or fluid mix (as in needles and intercourse)? I think a clear explanation on some other sites is lacking.
Additionally - even if my burst blister was 100% fresh and blood on a pole was 100% fresh from a HIV vicitim - this cannot lead to infection (as it is a surface)?
Don't worry - I won't have a follow-up question after this one.
Thanks so much in advance.
It is not a risk. HIV is not passed through casual contact and enviromental objects.