If she doesn't hear anything back after the test,she is negative.
no, she had the test a month ago. what im saying the results would be back by now and/or she would have been notified if something was wrong, right? if there was an exposure it would have been years ago!! just havnt been tested
Testing a month after possible exposure? No the test would not be realiable.
yes. they tested for everything. what makes me alittle nervous is she dosnt really have a primary care because she is between jobs so i keep thinking it would take alittle longer for them to notify her if something was wrong. but i think im just being paranoid!! a month is pretty conclusive right?
Was she given an HIV test?