OMG...sorry for my BAD BAD english understand...i am so SORRY!!!
I think now i could move on without dout!!!
Thank you for your patience ,Teak,and you basmoth!!!
'vaginal infections were detected in two of the HIV-positive women who had cunnilingus performed on them by a HIV-negative partner.'
Hi, not sure if it's my place to post, but what this means is that the women in the study who already were HIV+ also had vaginal infections, and that the HIV- partners who performed cunnilingus on them still remained HIV negative as per the conclusion.
So why the Ten years' Spanish study claimed "NOT ONE SINGLE CASE WAS DETECTED" but also claimed
_ "vaginal infections were detected in two of the HIV-positive women who had cunnilingus performed on them by a HIV-negative partner. "
??
You did not read about any verified document cases. For the last time. HIV is not transmitted by oral sex and you've been advised as to why and if you are unconfortable with oral sex don't do it. No one can force you to have oral sex.
Oh PLEASE HELP me for the LAST TIME!
May be it's my bad english caused the confusion.
But it really said " INFECTIONS were detected in TWO of the HIV-positive women who had cunnilingus performed on them by a HIV-negative partner."
TWO cases at least, wasn't it?
No it's not conflicting at all, what is conflicting is your cause to prove everyone is wrong and you are right. .
Sorry for bothering you, but it's so strange.
one aspect the study said ---vaginal infections were detected in two of the HIV-positive women who had cunnilingus performed on them by a HIV-negative partner.
another aspect it said --not a single case of HIV transmission was detected
they are conflicting, aren't they?
Oral sex does not transmit HIV. We are not going to go over this with you everyday. If you are unconfortable with oral sex, DON'T DO IT. It's simple.