are you saying the cdc recommnedations are wrong?
did you have any chance of exposure during the 6 month period?
did you have elisa, western blot and pcr testing?
From: looking4guidance
Its ok, my bf had it for a couple of years but didnt know it because he didnt get tested. I tested negative after six months of being wiith and 6 months later I tested positive.
From: looking4guidance
Its ok, my bf had it for a couple of years but didnt know it because he didnt get tested. I tested negative after six months of being wiith and 6 months later I tested positive.
this was not a p24 antigen test (which usually is done a two weeks post exposure),
this was a western blot with equivocal band p 24 twice with a negative elisa, negative pcr viral load at 2 weeks and 6 weeks. This was using new generation elisa, western blot. If too much testing, and not enough, can anyone reference a credible article with data that show evidence for false negative PCR viral load testing at one month when a individual is has not received post exposure prophylaxsis, is not immunosuppressed, and does not have a coninfection with hepatitis C? My understanding is that most individuals will have detectible viral loads via PCR if done greater than 28 days. I understand that current recommendations call for elisa at 3 months.
joey do you work with hiv
I don't think you need further testing, your results show that you don't have HIV. The Western Blot results are irrelevant. If you do test again - yes, a false positive is a possibility.
To many weeks have passed to have a P24 test. A P24 isn't a stand alone test and must be followed up with an antibody test anyway.
to much testing done here 3 months post exposure is conclusive