All anyone has to do is search your name and they will see some of the trouble you've caused on the other forums.
Teak,
The fact that I post on other forms does not mean I cause trouble. That is strictly your opinion.
But that is the deal. You see you suffer from self grandizement. You think you are god or king of this intire web site and your opinion reigns. News flash you are not.
I can not prove you wrong, because the evidence has been removed. Although we have had a witness step forward and remember your "rant." Regardless it really does not matter, you could prove me wrong & you probably will make that your new mission in life. A pitty really....
You didn't prove me wrong at all. You are saying that I said that there were no questioniare for blood donors which is totally false, that was never said at all. By the way, I've noticed that you've caused trouble on the other forums on Medhelp.
Dude, this forum is my life, I'm on here 24 hrs/day posting under different names. Most of the time I'm in the US posting under RegJoe, a couple of times a day I go to Israel and post under HIV24. A few times a week I go to Thailand and always Wear/a/Jimmy. Now you know, spread the word.
Reg. Joe
He spells a lot better than I and I am sure if someone was to bother to check into the timeing of posts, posts patterns etc...
They would see, that I post at different hours.... for those that don't know this, I reside in Thailand.
Reg Joe, I suspect is in the US.
Reg. Joe has PhD, where as I do not. A doctorate degree yes, a PhD no.
Sparkley if you took the time you will find that I have on occassion posted for questions adressed for Teak. I can assure you, I am not Teak, and he is not me.
For one, my replies are less terse, and have an ounce of compassion, scattered with horrid spelling.
wear/a/jimmy
OMG OMG OMG!!! Just yesterday I was HIV24!!!
No kidding.
Wear a Jimmy IS regularjoe.
He screwed up by answering a question addressed to him with the wrong screen name. see below in the other thread.
wear a jimmy has two screen names
Teak posted something to the effect "Have you ever given blood? There is NO questionaire."
I am the one that posted the FDA link of the FDA issued questionaire. Thus proveing Teak wrong, and then poof there went the thead!
I don't know if anyone put a questionaire on the thread, but it what was being discussed had nothing to do with there being a questionaire but the statement of "you it can be criminal for lying on the questionaire." We both (regularjoey and I) told Brian123, not to use the blood bank for testing. That's what the post was about.
Correct me if I'm mistaken but someone had to produce a link to the questionnaire, and that is when it became a moot point.
Sorry about what you think. regularjoey said that Brain123 could be possibly prosecuted for lying on the questionnaire, that it could be criminal. I said there were no statements on the questionnaire about falsifying the questionnaire and there isn’t. That is the jest of the post. Nothing was ever mentioned about there not being a questionnaire.
I have to side with Jimmy here, I do recall you ranting about how there is no questionnaire. He is right.
You're wrong in your statement. I don't care if you apologize or not. Brian123 knows what was said.
Well, the thread is gone, so we will never know will we?
Bummer, but if I am wrong.... or if I can be proven wrong... I apologize.
I know exactly what we were talking about. No where on the questionnaire does it say that you can be criminally prosecuted for incorrectly filling out the form. Nothing was even mentioned about there not being a form.
I would re-read it but that thread got pulled. Bummer, because I would have cut and pasted it for you.
"Teak stated that there is NO Blood Donar Questionare issued when giving blood...."
Nowhere on any of my posts did I ever make a comment such as that. Reread what I posted. I suggest you get your facts straight before you spread your factious spouts.
My comment pertains to the statement that Teak stated that there is NO Blood Donar Questionare issued when giving blood....
But that is not the case. Fact is, the FDA has issued a Donar Questionaire.
Teak is quick to mock & insult those that make wrong statments, as if he is not or could not be guilty of the same....
So, I just droped a freindly reminder, that Teak, can be wrong too, and in keeping that in mind, he should be a wee bit nicer to others.... even when their statements may not be 100% accurate. Why not say....
"Essentially you are correct, but....."
Rather than saying, YOU ARE WRONG, AND IF YOU WERE A REAL DOCTOR YOU WOULD KNOW THAT?
So yes, I find Teak to be offensive, often times if not all times without any cause.
My post was not meant to be a slam against homosexuals, short people, un-eduacted, un-qualified, bald, overwieght, people suffering from self grandizement, peolpe that can not spell, or those suffering from HIV.
Wear/a/Jimmy, Teak is positive, he cannot donate blood (if this is what you are talking about). If you know this, your comment is offensive. If you do not, mind this in the future.
Don't follow you Jaguar, but I am sure you have your reasons.
And with that comment, I fully despise wear/a/brain. You seem to have moved beyond the annoying, irritating, self-absorbed rant phase. Despicable.
I'm still filling out that Blood Donar Questionare issued by the FDA?
Have you finished your's yet?