i agree symptom usually dont show that soon, but not impossible . you have put yourself at risk for hiv and other std so a 13 week test is in order with other std test.
Yes, your symptoms CAN NOT be due to HIV.
Also, your risk level was low, I don't think you need to be too concerned here. A test at three months will remove any doubts if you have them.
I believe I made the facts sound wrong. He did ejaculate in my mouth, just not during vaginal sex. (I am a woman).
So it usually takes longer for the symptoms to show? That's a relief.
I agree with xhost, your symptoms cannot be due to HIV, they started too early.
I can't evaluate your risk level since you are not saying if you are a man or a woman.
Regardless, if you have a reason to be concerned about HIV, a test at 3 months will tell you your status.
Well, first of all, no, it is my understanding that the symptoms of primary HIV infection will not show up in just a couple of days. So, perhaps you might put the thought of that aside for the time being.
The truth of the matter is this: chances are, you did not catch HIV from the incident that you have described. However, having unprotected sex is never a good idea. There are, after all, plenty of STDs out there that you do not want to catch, including HIV.
And now for the facts: always use a condom when having sex. Anyone having regular unprotected sex should, in fact, worry about STDs, which is why using a condom is a good idea.
And now for the advice: if you are a sexually active person, you should be getting checked for STDs, including HIV, at least once a year. So, if you are worried about this particular incident, sure, go have a test at the appropriate time, and consider it your yearly HIV screening. Odds are, it's going to be negative, but, then you have the peace of mind, and that's a pretty good thing.