i had unprotected sex with a male. on 8/22/2008. i am a female.
I don't know what your risk was but those were not the proper test for diagnostic any one with a recent infection.
my accurence happened on 8/22/2008 elisa on 10/30/2008- non reactive
11/03/2008 hiv 2 dna/rna qualitative real time -not dected
11/03/2008 hiv-2 proviral dna qualitative, pcr - not deceted
means that im hiv neg. no further testing needed? i thought that i had to test again at 90 days and 6 months.
Reported Report this Spam
Abuse
Was this comment helpful to you?Yes No
by Edward W Hook, MD
Add as Friend
Edward W Hook, MD
Male
Member since Oct 2007
, Nov 13, 2008 05:38PM
You do not need repeat testing, your results are conclusive. EWH
there for i need to test again? im confused.
PCR tests have never been approved for diagnostic use, except in infants born to HIV positive mothers up to 15 months.
by Edward W Hook, MD
Add as Friend
Edward W Hook, MD
Male
Member since Oct 2007
, Nov 13, 2008 04:54PM
Good question. Laboratory tests can be quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative tests give you a yes or no answer to whether something (like HIV) is present of not. Quantitative tests for HIV tell you how much virus is present. We use quantitative tests in caring for patients with HIV to judge how therapy is doing (it should reduce the amount of HIV virus present in blood), as well as, on some occasions, to monitor the progression of disease. For figuring out if a person has HIV or not, qualitative tests are the way to go. Just as you cannot be a little bit pregnant, you cannot be a little bit infected. Either you are or are not.
Reread the one you asked the orginal question in. It's been answered.