I have 3 stents and have had numerous heart caths along with a heart attack. I'm having significant issues again with a recent nuclear stress test pointing out numerous issues from suspected blockages, irregular heart beat, and a host of heart muscle related issues.
My stents were in the LAD, RCA, Circumflex.
I have been to 3 cardiologist since moving here from another state. First one stated I have 60% reocclussion in all 3 vessels. Second cardiologist told me 50% while the current told me 40-50%. How can there be so much variation??
When having a heart cath, do cardiologist have a scienticfic method of evaluating and determining degree of blockage or is it just an educated guess from experience???
None of the cardiologist will touch a blockage under 70%.........don't know why but I don't especially like playing Russian Roulette with a 95% occluded LAD like I had the first time.........and without any indication!! It was found totally by luck as I was having surgery and going for physical therapy. My physical therapist noticed I huffed and puffed too much while on some of the machines and suggested I see a cardiologist! She was a God's Saint that I'm still here today since we have a serious problem with MCI in our family both maternal and paternal. There was never a lack of exercise in my case so I am assuming it was genetics and diet???
The way that cardiologists determine the degree of blockage in a coronary artery involves several different mechanisms. A variation of 10-20% for a lesion is not uncommon (the 40-60% variability that you mentioned). There is no clinically meaningful difference between a 40% and a 60% lesion (it means you have a moderate blockage in that coronary artery). 70% narrowing is typically the cutoff for when it is indicated to place a stent, but that is an "older" indication based on what the cardiologist has estimated on visualization of the catheterization images (there are software programs used in almost every cath lab that will determine the luminal narrowing exactly, but these are based on the 2dimensional images that catheterization provides and are not 100% accurate). A better way to determine if a coronary artery, moderate lesion is clinically meaningful is to perform intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) during the catheterization. These methods are much more accurate in determining the severity of luminal narrowing/blockage and whether blood flow is impaired because of that blockage in the heart.
Coronary artery disease is a complicated disease that involves many, many risk factors; the most common of which are smoking history, family history/genetics, diet, environmental factors, and gut flora (to name just a few).
Hope that helps.
Copyright 1994-2018MedHelp.All rights reserved. MedHelp is a division of Vitals Consumer Services, LLC.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.