Thanks for the post, your highness.
Q1:"the incidence of PVC's are rarely a problem or considered benign?"
In a general population of persons with structurally normal hearts, there is no good epidemiologic evidence to suggest that PVCs affect the longevity of the populace. Individuals, however, with PVCs may feel badly from them due to palpitations.
Q2:"Second, I read last night that depending upon depolarization of the PVC's can be a predictor for VT or V-fib?"
Some PVCs may indicate that a person has ARVD, a very rare condition.
I think that you would agree that a cough is a fairly benign symptom? However, uncommonly it may indicate cancer or TB. Similarly, PVCs can indicate essentially nothing, like a cough, or rarely may indicate something wrong, like a cough.
Q3:" Am I reading too much into this?"
All I can say, is that in a population as a whole with structurally normal hearts, PVCs have not been shown to increase mortality.
Q4:"Does PVC's increase with age always?"
Q5:"Finally, my cardiologist is saying that I really dont need to see him yearly ? Should I insist? "
Most patients with PVCs don't need to see a cardiologist.
Best of luck.
Sorry about the post, I just remembered not to post for 2 months. I will stay away re: posting after this last one. I will comment but not post. Thanks and sorry!!
Just looking at one of my past ECG's and it showed the following:
Vent, rate 118 BPM
PR interval 164 ms
QRS duration 104 ms
QT/QTc 328/459 ms
P-R-T axes 47 - 16 - 18
NonSpecific T wave abnormality
What does this mean??
I have another ECG on hand:
Vent Rate 117 BPM
PR Interval 160ms
QRS Duration 100 ms
QT/QTc 288/398 ms
P-R-T axes 51-42-36
Whats up with this. The cardio never eluded to any abnormality re: Prolonged QT?
Can you comment on the two ecg data provided?
Hey my friend,
I need a little of your input as regards the results of my last echo which I just got (done 9th May 2002):
All that was measured were as follows:
Left Ventricular Diastole 42mm as against range 37-56mm
LV posterior wall (diastole) 12mm as against normal range 6-11mm
Intraventricular septum (diastole) 14mm as against normal range 6-11mm.
I'm a big (6'4" 220LB) and quite fit and healthy 43 yr-old white male. The echo report also stated normal LV cavity size with good contraction, and LVH. My GP says he'd expect LVH in a big fella like myself: I favour agreeing with him, but am nonetheless left wondering why the LV diastole is quite low in range.......... my HR is quite slow whilst at rest and maybe the contractile force is - in the setting of a 'fit' heart - quite low (low LVD) even with LVH???
I'd REALLY appreciate your views on the above.
Just spoke a cardiologist out of NY- he was a cheif of staff at one the majors in NYC. Actually, he is my best friends father. I faxed him everything I had and he said: I have no R on T, no Long QT syndrome, just unifocal PVC's and probably most predisposed to this due to an adrenogenic response (anxiety) causing much of this. In any case, all is normal nothing to be concerned about. Told me to take the atenenol for a while till I feel better - he said 12.5 mg per day is less than a childs dose and even suggested going to 25 mg to have any real impact. In any case, I feel much better and thanks for your support. Much appreciated !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hi Hankstar: I am significantly smaller than BigMick (5'7", 135 lbs - female), but have almost identical LVH values (13 mm for both septum and posterior wall). Given that men's hearts are bigger than women's, are there any gender-related norms that are used to quantify the degree of LVH? I mean, do my values also suggest mild LVH? Probably should have asked my doctor, but I obtained a copy of my echo independently and have never discussed with it her. Do you have any information?
Would appreciate your input,
I have to say that I'm concerned (& I hope I'm not alone but fear that I am) at some of the threads on this board. I have been reading some responses, in particular, those from a "Hankstar." It seems that Hankstar dispenses what appears to be "credible" sounding medical advice (in fact, seemingly close to practicing medicine) to clearly concerned "patients" after "patients." In this recent thread, someone types out some details of an ekg and it gets immediately interpreted as a possible Long QT Int Syndrome on the basis of "number!" I'm sure the brief anxiety that was created on the "over reading" of a "portion" of one's ekg (without the benefit of knowing if there were other factors such as electrolyte imbalance or even seeing the actual strip)was anything but helpful--and in my opinion, dangerous. In fact, it was even neccessary to have a physician contacted as a precaution. This is not helpful and a waste of medical resources, and at a minimum, totaly avoidable. Additionally, blurting out medical mubo jumbo and then trying to balance it with "By the way, I'm not a doctor" is not appropriate fair balance.
There are plenty of doctors today that over read ekg's for LVH and other begnin findings, the world doesn't need more.
Hankstar, you may already know this but you seem to have a very unhealthy preoccupation not only with your own health, but with this board and, in my opinion again, "practicing" medicine. I also don't think your a doctor as a doctor wouldn't reach conclusions you seem to do so quickly without first seeing their patient. In the future, if your not able to keep yourself from reading every thread, try to think about the possible anxiety you may cause before resonding--and the implications of that anxiety (possible increased medical costs and second guessing qualified physicians)--in the long run even though "patients" may appreciate your responses in the short run.
Translation: before scaring a person to death by telling them they may have Prolonged QT based on partial reading of an ekg, try to resist writing your interpretations until you do rec' your med degree. And pls discard your copy of Dubins EKG Interpretation..it's not healthy. I can't say that I blame the forum staff as they don't monitor the patient-to-patient comments.
if you were to red thru many of the posts in this forum, u would see that more often than not hankstar is asked for his opinion by others on here.
p.s. to medking,
normal heart rate is between 60-100 bpm so anything below or above this will read abnormal on computerized ekg. if its 59 or 101 bpm, simply because its not within the range, it says abnormal, thats what i was told by my doc.
like you may not have noticed, the doctors throw here and there comments in after they read what we write. that shows that the comments are overlooked. i am sure if someone would write something totally wrong it would be corrected. the forum is a support for all of us and i am sure a lot of us feel reassured either way. if you get better informed about your problems you can give helpfull tips etc. and that is all what hank is doing.
I agree 110% with your comments.
Beating on Hankstar is getting out of hand. We are free to read and free to make our own decisions with out beating on someone for an oppinion. I guess I am guilty of this too. Frankly, I must admit I have found more answers to my questions through Hanks direct questions of the doctors than most of the questions I see on the site. Lets attempt to be civil here. If you dont like what you see ignore it. If you care to ask Hank for assistance then take it with a grain of salt after all, as he states he is not a doctor ....which is ok.
So my advise to all on the forum take it easy before we all get too excited and we start suffering from one cardiac issue or another.
Have a calm weekend!
Hankster has responded to people and is trying to be helpful. He has never claimed to be a doctor and I have noticed he always tells the person to confirm things with their doctor.
This is his opinion and is usually classified as such.
A forum is a place for people of differing opinions to come together and discuss ideas for the common good of all. The forum is designed to support all ideas and opinions. Not everyone agrees on everything in this world. It would be unnecessary to have a forum of this type if everyone always agreed on method of treatment or diagnoses.
Respect of other person's opnions even though they differ from yours is necessary to promote exchange of ideas and advice.
Please respect other people's opinion even though they don't match yours as we respect your opinion.
I agree 110% with heartwise, trrrix, and paule.
You others are defending Hankstar so vehemently, but are not listening. This is not Hankstar's forum! He doesn't need to comment on everyone's comment or comment on a comment! If someone doesn't agree with him, that doesn't make him right, and them wrong!
I have been appalled on occasion by the *medical* advice he depenses so freely. As a medical professional and someone with REAL and very serious heart disease, I know that it is critical to watch exactly what you say to patients. Those, like Hankstar and many of the regulars, who are so preoccupied with their hearts (even though they deny it, it is so obvious), are very susceptible to fear and will pick on anything they think might apply to them. Their fear is real but many times unfounded.
I will say that Hankstar is always polite and reassuring, even after inappropriately dropping an diagnosis. That is why they like him so much...he feeds directly into the neuroses. It becomes self-perpetuating. Maybe he needs the forum more for that. It is nice to be wanted. On the other hand, I made one quick non medical comment suggesting a great website message board to Guenter and got blasted! You can't win.
Maybe the solution is for Hankstar to start his own board!!!!
OK, whilst reluctant to become embroiled in the issue of whether or not Hankstar rightly or wrongly 'dominates' this forum, I nonetheless feel compelled to comment thus:
1. Firstly, at the risk of sounding slightly arrogant (which is NOT my intention), I speak as a well-educated person with a BSc, a MSc, and a PhD, as well as other professional qualifications;
2. I am a relatively fit and generally healthy 43 yr-old male who most definately is anxious about cardiac issues. I have had noticable ectopy for 20 years, and AF for the last 5 years (5 short nocturnal episodes - I am not on any meds). I have accordingly met and consulted with a variety of docs and cardiologists.
3. Having become convinced that it is more often than not a case of 'patient heal thyself', I have rigorously applied my own research abilities to investigating issues connected with cardiac health, and can surmise with no small degree of confidence that the advice dispensed by Hank is IMHO generally considered and sound........ and MOST helpfull and reassuring in the vast majority of cases. But as the old saying goes, you can't please all of the people all of the time..... My own general paractice doc is a great doc as they go, but he freely admits that I know far more about ectopy and AF than he does. My first cardio tried to give me flecainide for the occasional PVC..... He also gave me digoxin for vagally-mediated AF (he did not even recognise/acknowledge a distinction between vagally and adrenergically mediated arrythmia.....). Further to investigating the situation for myself, I took none of these meds, and am glad I did not. As incidentally is my current (younger and far more open-minded and knowledgable) cardiologist (and EP) who was a bit horrified at the aforementioned suggested drug therapy for myself.
3. Hank is CLEARLY an intelligent individial who has - as a result of his own undoubted anxiety and obsession over his own cardiac issues (no offence Hank mate) - spent a great deal of time learning all he can about heart health and heart ill-health. I myself accordingly regard his presence here as a valuable resource to be drawn upon PROVIDING one realises and appreciates that:
a) Hank is NOT a doc;
b) Hank is - in common with ALL docs - NOT omniscient;
c) One takes Hank's advice IN CONJUNCTION with ones own deductions and ones own docs advice/input.
Believe me, I am no fool, and I regard Hank's presence here as a valuable addition to that service provided by the CC Docs. Illustrative of this is the fact that I noted down Hank's email address a couple of days ago in case he stops commenting/participating here (sorry Hank fella!!). Whether Hank maintain his presence here on this forum or not, I will be grateful to continue to have him on board (directly as opposed to via this board) as a valuable information resource... and friend. And you can take THAT to the bank.
Personally, I think we need Hank! I have derived immeasurable comfort and reassurance from him so stop picking on him! If you don't like his posts, just ignore them...but let others like me continue to read his posts; I do not want to lose touch with this man. He is respectful, compassionate and knowledgeable and I think he's a tremendous asset to this forum. He always defers to the dear doctor and makes it clear he is not a physician, so what's wrong with that??
Definition of 'forum': A public meeting; any medium for public discussion. Enough already. If you don't like comments from hankstar, don't read 'em. In this day, a person with a medical condition should empower themselves with as much information as possible on their condition. One great way to do that is via this forum, whether it be info from the good doctor or anyone else who wishes to add their comments.
Hank's participation on this forum is an extra bonus for all of us and we should think ourselves very fortunate to have him, I know I certainly do. He is always helpful and compassionate with all those who write in. Obviously Hank has a great understanding of heart issue and this is an enormous plus for us all. It is also very comforting to know that Hank experiences what we all experience so understands only too well what we are going through.
More power to your pen, Hank (or computer keyboard.....).
Hope you are well and chest pains abating, it was kind of you to keep on writing on the forum to help others when you were unwell.
Best Wishes, Linda
Hank, I took 12.5 mg of ateneol for two days. One dose per day and it settled the PVc's and I decided not to take on the third day. Is it normal to get withdrawl from this? ie: nervousness, elevated heart beat ? How long would it last for? Also would PVC's become worse if I suddenly came off? Of course two days dose is hardly addictive to the body?
Hank, I dont have your email: mine is:
Send me yours lets stay in touch.
Great forum, but it will be significantly less of a resource as far as I am concerned without Hank present and actively participating. I've probably learned all that I reasonably can here anyway - virtually all posts pertaining to anxiety over PVCs and short runs of NSVT etc in an otherwise healthy heart receive more or less the same replies from the docs here. Furthermore, I'm now very well aware that there are many thousands of individuals out there who have the same arrythmic manifestations and concerns as myself and whose future outlook in terms of their health and longevity appears to be more or less the same as any other Joe out there- it's great to know one is in good (and healthy) company (-:
So I won't be hanging around much either - better to get on living life as full as one can than pouring over every post to this forum.... as I've already said... duplicity becomes an increasing issue the longer one is around here. I'm the first to admit that I spend FAR too much time lurking on this and one or two other cardiac arrythmia forums, and I think that the time has well and truly come to spend less time hunched over my PC fueling my anxious and obsessive nature and more time out wandering the wild and magnificant coastline right outside my front door here in NE England (UK). And better to leave the forum free for those who are in the early stages of learning and seeking reassurance.
My sincerest and best wishes to all of my fellow arrythmia sufferers for a healthy and happy future.
I'll be in touch HS,
i have a couple english questions, i will stop in london in juni. i give you my e-mail ***@****.
Hankstar said over and over that he's not a doctor so stop picking on him. It was very simple and I don't know why you bother to take him literally.
Doctors are sometimes WRONG that can cost people's lives! That's why we all should ask for a second opinion. I would ask people like Hankstar what he thinks and then talk with more people of similiar education.
In case with PVC's, not long ago, PVC is viewed as an omen and doctors would treat it with drugs. Now, we have a study showing that people who take medications for benign PVC's are much more likely to die than those who don't take medications for it.
Doctors used to dismiss fish oil as a snake oil. Now, we have evidence that it is as effective as many heart drugs in treating venticular-related arrythmias thanks to the power of omega-3 acids.
When my mother was pregnant, my doctor prescribed amphetamines because she was too fat (huh? She wasn't!) and he told her that I should be drinking formulas instead of breast milk. That was a horrible advice because formulas have caused me to develop allergies. Now, we all know that breastmilk is the best milk for infants and formulas should NOT be used over breastmilk.
Even to this day, I've done research on a certain blood "abnormality" and my doctor said, "You need to drink more water.. that's really nothing tho." While he's right that the "abnormal" result is really nothing, he failed to realize that my abnormality is caused from too much hydration (I drink a lot)!
Always ask for lab results and do your research at a library or on the Internet. Doctors don't really know everything, trust me!