jmcruz,
thanks for the post.
1-I would be very grateful if you see my exam (Web-Zip file) and tell me your opinion (any significative problem, namelly ischemia or other situations?)
Im not certified to read stress exams. Im not sure from your interpretation, but it sounds negative. If there is any ambiguity in the EKG portion of a stress test a nuclear stress test can be performed.
2-Was the test results achieved good for aerobic sports, for free diving or for scuba diving ?
Only the physician actually taking care of you can make recommendations for activity. 13 minutes is a good amount of time for a stress test.
3-Was the slow recovery pathological?
There are a lot of parts of the stress test. One of which is measuring the heart rate recovery in rest. If the rest of the test is normal, I wouldnt think too much of this
4-My dad died at 73y with a sudden and massive heart attack.With that age,is it a risk factor for me?
Generally, we regard heart disease in the 40s in males and 50s for females as a significant family history.
good luck
3 years ago I started having dizzy spells when I ran. I started with a resting ecg at my GP and it showed a depressed T-wave. This the ecg machine always spits out as indicative of ischaemia. That led to a stress test at the cardio. which they found normal, but they did not go long enough to the point where I have problems. The stress test with a nuclear medicine gave a false positive for a blockage which led to a cath. which showed I had no blockages. I still have the depressed T-wave and no one says anything about it anymore, ignoring the indication given by the ecg machine
Thanks Dr. and friends. I will assume complety good the interpretation of my Cardio of "there is no problems" and do any activity. I thinks that's the best way. A nuclear test for now, NO, I think (I would only consider it if tha probabilities of positive were larger).