thanks for reply. Think the real question am asking is first test showed large defect consistent w/ artifact that turned out to be 100% occluded artery and new test showed small defect consistent w/ artifact in same area so assuming this is not artifact is it normal to have small defect remaining after stent placement or should there be no defect at all considering there was no heart attack?
Hello Jay4471
it is hard to give you an accurate answer over the Internet without reviewing your history and examining you personally. However, I will try to give you some pointers that are helpful.
One of the most important things that cardiologists use to base their decisions to do cardiac catheterization are patient symptoms. I presume that the stress test that was done on you 2 months ago was due to occurrence of symptoms.
Routine stress testing after performance of cardiac catheterization and/or stenting is not indicated if the patient is not really experiencing any symptoms. One of the major limitations of stress testing includes false-positive result, wherein the stress test is read as positive when there is actually no problem. I suspect that in your case if you not having any symptoms, the stress this is likely false positive. It is also reassuring that you do not have any “reversible ischemia” on your stress test.
Of course, if you are having symptoms or develop symptoms of chest pain or shortness of breath in the future, a cardiac catheterization may need to be repeated.
Hope that helps
CCFHeartMD19