He is saying the person would have to have treated and cleared the virus and then three years would have to have lapse for the person's account of events to make sense. If the drug did not introduced to trials until 2010 then the three year timing does not jive. Somehow there might be confusion with the dates in that post.
People who did not treat in a trial usually take (or took) a combination of drugs:
Just as an example : Hepatitis C FDA-Approved Combination Therapy
Boceprevir + Pegylated Interferon + Ribavirin
Telaprevir+ Pegylated Interferon + Ribavirin
Pegasys + Copegus (peginterferon alfa-2a + ribavirin)
PegIntron + Rebetol (peginterferon alfa-2b + ribavirin)
Roferon A + Ribavirin (Standard interferon alfa-2a + ribavirin)
Intron A + Rebetol (Standard Interferon alfa-2b + ribavirin)
Infergen + Ribavirin (consensus Interferon + ribavirin)
______________
If you look to your right there is a box that has "Recent Activity" then another that has Medhelp Answers and the box under that says "Related forums"
http://www.medhelp.org/forums/Hepatitis-Social/show/76
Yes. GS-7977 hasn't been in clinical trials for 3 years.
Also, what the heck is Copegus? I am stunned to see 7977 the 48 months of something else. What is all that?
Copegus is the manufacturers name for ribavirin.
The first clinical trial using GS-7977 was GS-7977 in addition to peg-interferon and ribavirin, The total treatment duration was for 48 weeks. Plus to be declared to have achieved SVR means is no detectable hepatitis C virus present in a blood sample 6 months after completion of therapy. 48 weeks was the previous stand duration for treatment with those two drugs in genotype 1 patients.
There wasn't time for anyone to relapse 3 years after treating with GS-7077.
Hector