Hi Terri,
I got my anti-body results back today. The herpes select IGG 1 - was .07, IGG 2 was also .07 and the IGM was not detected. My only question, is it strange that both igg 1 and 2 came back at the same value of .07? does that suggest a faulty test or non reactive form of the virus, or am I just way over analyzing this, and it is simply a coincidence that the values are the same. Thanks
They pick up about 96-97% of culture proven HSV 2 positive patients (that is how the study was structured to look at this question). The number of glycoprotein g deficient strains is significantly overstated, as of my read of the literature.
Terri
Also, could you tell me how sensitive the type specific igg blood tests are, specifically the igg2 test? I have seen sensitivity percentages anywhere from 85% to 96%. I'm hoping that the disclaimer that as many as 1 in 10 cases of hsv are glycoprotein g deficient is over stated?
aaaah, that is a big help in understanding your situation.
Yes, if your IgG test comes back negative, that is the one you want to pay attention to, not the IgM. And enough time has gone by for accuracy.
I've not seen herpes present as a fissure at the groin fold, but I've seen many fungal infection present in that way, for sure!
Terri
The Igm test was a blood tested performed at 11 weeks after potential exposure along with a blood type specific igg test. The igg type 1&2 tests were both negative but the Igm type 1/2 was positive. The nurse said that this means that I had a recent exposure. Then I was retested at 15 weeks to double check and that is when a different dr office ordered the blood pcr test. I called that office on Wednesday and asked them to rerun my blood sample as an igg elisa. I should have the results in 1 to 3 days.
Have you ever seen a case of hsv that causes a linear fissure at the groin fold but no apparent blisters or red bumps?
Assuming my igg antibody test comes back negative I would like to be able to stop worrying if that symptom which has recurred once since I first noticed it, is a cause for concern or not. My goal is to be able to accurately and reliably move on from this one way or the other. Thanks for your help.
No, it is not reliable at all! The made an error in ordering this test. You aren't going to have herpes virus in your blood, you might have it from a sore, but not in the blood. PCR testing for herpes should be done from lesions, not blood. Blood testing should be for antibody, not virus.
The IgM test, was that done from blood also? It is notorious for false positives, and the fact that it was positive from blood just confirms all of that.
What you need is type specific antibody testing.
I'm so sorry you went through all of this, what a mess.
Terri