the herpes WB looks at more parts of the igg response to herpes infection than the other igg tests do. that's why we recommend it for confirming low positives.
no reason to doubt your WB results.
grace
By the way, I have never had any symptoms whatsoever. No coldsores etc on my mouth for HSV1.
My point exactly. Do you think that the WB was incorrect? It said I was positive for HSV1 and negative for HSV2. I can't reiterate enough that I have had three IGG specific tests that indicated positive for HSV2 and showed negative for HSV1. I can't see how three tests could be incorrect. Thank-you in advance.
even the herpes WB still misses 1 out of every 10 hsv1 infections. other igg based tests miss even more than that. No too surprising at all actually that the other tests didn't pick up on your hsv1 and the WB did.
congrats on being hsv2 negative so you can move forward from this :)
grace
If I was positive for HSV1, wouldn't it have shown up on the IGG test results as well. I did have another IGG test performed on March 12, 2012 and that also showed positive for HSV2 and negative for HSV1. That would have been approximately 15 weeks after my last encounter. So now I have had three IGG tests, all positive for HSV2 and all negative for HSV1. The WB came back the exact opposite...and that test was performed at 13 week post encounter. I have never had any symptoms and can't imagine that three IGG tests could all come back as false positive especially done at different time intervals. THOUGHTS anyone???
Well, you need to get a WB 16weeks after last exposure. Not much we can tell you other than that. If the WB was done too soon, it might be a false-negative, yes.
The next one will tell the story.