Hi there, thank you for answering my question.
As part of a routine well women exam, I requested complete STD testing. I have never had symptoms nor been treated for any prior STDs. I was shocked when the Dr.s nurse called and revealed that I tested postive for HSV2. I asked if she was certain, as I have had cold sores since childhood, but never a genital outbreak. After I settled from the initial phone call, I called back and asked for the specifics of the results. She stated that my IgG level indicated that I had been in contact with the HSV2 virus at some point. I asked for the specific level and she stated ".92" I understand that you can be a carrier without demonstrating symptoms, but with my history of +HSV1, I am not convinced that I "am postive for HSV2". Can you please help me? I can't describe the sense of anxiety I am feeling.
.92 is not a positive test result. It falls into the category of equivocal. I have no idea why they told you it was positive, but that's an error. This number does not necessarily mean that "you have been in contact with the virus at some point". As you correctly suspect, it can be a could be some antibody crossover from your HSV 1 infection.
When was the last time you had a sexual contact? You should allow about 4 months from your last sexual contact for greatest accuracy.
I would not assume with a .92 result that you are infected with HSV 2.
Thank you for your response. My last encounter was in October, which is another reason I was confident that I was not "positive". I have also been retested in the meantime, and it came back negative.
Now my frustration is mainly with my doctor, who refused to entertain any of my questions regarding HSV 1 crossover, why she claimed .92 was positive when it's not, and her lack of knowledge of the rate of false positives under 3.5.
Do you have any professional articles or literature that I could offer her? As frustrated as I am about how I was treated, if I can do anything to educate her so this doesn't happen to others, I certainly want to help.
You're right, the lab report absolutely stated that .92 was "equivocal", that's part of the frustration. I spoke to my dr. specifically about the difference between what the lab stated and what she stated, and she just said "it's her office policy, anything above .91 is positive". I question if that is even ethical....
Thank you again for your help. Thank goodness there are experts with correct info out there!
Copyright 1994-2018MedHelp.All rights reserved. MedHelp is a division of Vitals Consumer Services, LLC.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.