I had exactly this problem because the ENA panel did not include testing for the particular antibody that was causing my ANA to read positive. I had, as it turned out, the anticentromere antibody, which at that time, at least, was not being included in the ENA panel. When my ANA testing finally showed an anticentromere staining pattern, I had to finally insist that my doctor order the anticentromere b test as a separate test. It was off-the-chart positive, as had been my ANA testing. I was finally diagnosed with limited systemic sclerosis (AKA scleroderma or CREST syndrome). But diagnosis was delayed for many years because of the failure of the ENA panel to include my particular antibody, and because doctors were using criteria to try to diagnose scleroderma, that hadn't been updated since 1980. Aside from some puffiness in the fingers, I didn't have the usual skin thickening that most scleroderma patients have. When the diagnostic criteria were finally updated in 2012, it finally became recognized that finger puffiness may sometimes be the only skin effect, and is quite typical to scleroderma.
My ANA test Low positive and ENA profile all negative.. What will be the cause.. any idea..but suffering itching, inflammation, joint paints and very uncomfortable situation in day to day life.. can someone give answer for this please...
ena antibody panel 6 test all came back negative what does it mean ?
ena antibody panel 6 test all came back negative what does it mean ?
I am waiting for more results. I've been off for a half a year or so getting alarming bruising on my legs, daily headaches and the last straw was the gross swelling of my legs. My dr kept telling me it was age related (42). I mean really? My ENA came back at 1:5120. I'm a little freaked out. They think lupus, but I inly me 3 of the diagnostic criteria. Luckily because the titre was so high, I got into a specialist quickly who is doing more testing fully expecting to get more lupus diagnosing criteria. I am a little freaked out!!
Unfortunately, the ENA panel does not include one of the most common scleroderma antibodies: anticentromere B. The docs tested and retested me on the ENA panel from 1997 to 2008, without thinking to order anticentromere B as a separate one. Finally I asked my doc to order an anticentromere B test. It was hugely positive! I've now been diagnosed by a top scleroderma specialist as having limited systemic scleroderma, despite having no skin hardening.
Consider your symptoms. Do they include any of these things? Raynaud's, gastric reflux, constipation &/or diarrhea, loss of hair on the limbs, puffy fingers, tendonitis or frozen shoulder, huffing and puffing when trying to walk quickly, dry cough? Any of those can be symptoms of limited systemic scleroderma.
I just found this thread though Google.
I have an ANA titer of 5120 (since 2 years), and a positive AMA titer, but since my ENA is negative I'm still without official diagnosis after many, many years. The rheumatogist (who has now seen the last of me says I don' thave lupus, althoug I have most of the symptoms. I'm also not on medication (except for pain killers) suc as Prednisone. reason: when I asked my rheumatologist for something that possible could help me or at least stabilize my condition, he refused. reason: he was afraid I would sue him for all he's got when something would happen to me whist on corticosteroids.
PS: haven't been pain free one single day over the last 11 years, and simply have np (social) life because of the pain and the permanent exhaustion.
I know it is soooo frustrating! :(
Prednisone helped me, but I must admit that sometimes when I'm weaning off, I have some crazy symptoms flare up along w/ the feeling of hopelessness.
Even though the ANA is cosidered unreliable, most drs. are really looking at that test as the main deal. So to play their game, spend time in the sun prior to the ANA test and it will make the ANA elevated. The sun only affects people w/ lupus that way. But for the most part, I stay out of the sun as much as possible.
I have had two positive ANAs with two different doctors. Both doctors were wishy washy about a diagnosis. I went to a third doctor who ordered an ANA test, but he told me that the ANA was a very unreliable test. He told me that he bases a diagnosis more on symptoms and whether or not a twelve day dose of pregnisone would make me feel better. He said that was more proof to him than a positive ANA. Well- I got the call today and the third ANA was negative. But......the pregnisone is making me feel better than I have felt in years. So..... still don't have a definite diagnosis! I will have to wait to see what he says in March.
Honestly, I've not seen too many ANAs that high. It has jumped all over the place. The last one the dr. did was neg. He mentioned that he thought might not have lupus after all. I thought....get real mister. A medical advisor from the lupus foundation told me there is nothing else but lupus that can cause an ANA reading that high and a neg. reading is meaningless. For unknow reasons ANA levels can flucuate and do not reflect disease activity.
Keep us posted. Praying for you.
Wow, Karajo. That's a really high titer. Mine is not close to that high. I have two patterns, speckled and homogenous with a titer of 1:160, but I feel horrible and have been sick off and on for four years (mostly on). Since September it's been really bad. Not spending anytime in the sun, though :)
So far, there are not many things that come back as alarming to the doctors, anyway. Just the ANA, CBC slightly out of normal range, tachycardia and something in my liver (which they think is now a probable fatty infiltration and not a hemangioma). That's what the doctor's are finding, anyway.
I have an MRI coming up soon. Waiting on a date.
I too had a postive ANA and neg ENA. They are supposed to take the 11 criteria of lupus to dx someone. It does get sooo very frustrating. It wan't until I spent time in the sun prior to my ANA being checked that they took note.... 1:2,560 ANA homogeneous pattern.
I'm in the same boat, apparently. Higher titer of 1:640 twice and one 1:320 in between over the course of two years. Most recent had what was apparently a totally normal ENA panel, so...I've been told "eh, looks normal". Now what, right?
Please keep us posted! This "game" is soooo frustrating! Do not pass go, but let's collect your 200 dollars!