MedHelp Social Community
1k Members
518031 tn?1295578974

General Motors

Just wondering how everyones feels about the govenement owning 70% of this once great car company?..They now can tell them what kind of cars and trucks to build or not to build. Personally I don't think they have any business, getting in to companies in the private sector..Back in the 70's the goverenment bailed out Chryslar without being a owner of the company. So let me know what you all think
57 Responses
535822 tn?1443980380
I t gives the government 60% controlling stake , It is one of the largest peacetime Naturalisations.,with the road ahead  uncertain, heavy potential conflicts and many risks to tax payers.The only thing it makes clear is that the government is firmly in the business of running companies using Taxpayer Dollars(.I am quoting from the news and bloomberg) ..pretty scary all round in my humble opinion... each day there is another happening to put thye nail in the proverbial coffin, wait till VAT begins Value Added Tax at 25% you havent lived with that.... we'll be lucky if we can afford a motor scooter....
765070 tn?1384873394
Yeah, I do not like the idea of the Government running GM.  But what choice do I or anyone else have.  Also, even though they are going into Bancruptcy; the Government is still going to give $32 billion to GM to restructure the automaker.  Yeah, we will not ever really know where this money goes just like the other $20 billion we gave to them to help GM not go into bancruptcy.  I am sure that it mostly goes to the unions not directly to building cars or to help the company get on it feet.  Just my opinion.  
535822 tn?1443980380
I think you are right about the Unions,I see Hummer is going aswell.
Avatar universal

The government saved this great car company that, unfortunately, didn't pay attention to what many of their customers wanted. Of course that is why this great company was going downhill in the first place. If they would have produced hybrid vehicles only a couple of years ago, then they would be doing okay right now and wouldn't have needed the government to save them.

I see it this way: the government is investing in the future of this country by saving GM.
518031 tn?1295578974
Well now I was in the car business for almost 10 years before I got sick. GM had a hybird 2 years before Toyota or Honda, and the gov't paid them not to produce it..that was during the Clinton years...and then when Toyota came out with the Pruis and Honda the Insight, Gm ws too late on the technology. So maybe people should study things a little better to know what they are talking about. This President wants the gov't to own private companies and noone is going to tell me any different, it is called SOCIALISM... and when the gov't owns private companies that is what you have..period
Avatar universal

"So maybe people should study things a little better to know what they are talking about."

I think I follow the news better than most Americans. Since you think I need to study more.... can you give me a credible link to back up your statement that GM had invented a hybrid vehicle 2 years before Toyota or Honda ? And how the government paid them not to produce it ?
Have an Answer?
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.
Here’s how your baby’s growing in your body each week.
These common ADD/ADHD myths could already be hurting your child
This article will tell you more about strength training at home, giving you some options that require little to no equipment.
In You Can Prevent a Stroke, Dr. Joshua Yamamoto and Dr. Kristin Thomas help us understand what we can do to prevent a stroke.
Smoking substitute may not provide such a healthy swap, after all.