Aa
is circumcision right.?
do circumcised men enjoy sex more than the others...is this true?...
> do circumcised men enjoy sex more than the others...is this true?...
No, it is not true. Some time after circumcision (years usually) the glans becomes dry and less sensitive due to continuous exposure and friction with the cloths, so you need more effort and different practices to get sexual pleasure. Besides, the inner surface of the foreskin has thousands of erogenous nerve endings. All these are removed during circumcision. This is even more true for the frenulum.
It is not more complicated than that: there is a reason why men are born with foreskin.
No, it is not true. Some time after circumcision (years usually) the glans becomes dry and less sensitive due to continuous exposure and friction with the cloths, so you need more effort and different practices to get sexual pleasure. Besides, the inner surface of the foreskin has thousands of erogenous nerve endings. All these are removed during circumcision. This is even more true for the frenulum.
It is not more complicated than that: there is a reason why men are born with foreskin.
Many argue that circumcision does and doesn’t reduce the penis glans sensitivity in sexual play. However, neither pro-circumcision claims nor anti-circumcision claims have been proven scientifically to be greater than one other in sexual play. However, an Anti-Circumcision Scientist was working to prove that circumcision indeed reduced a male’s sexuality and surprisingly found it not to be true (http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Sex/story?id=3436936&page=1). Instead, found both to be equally matched when it came to sexuality. Also, the CDC and many other government agencies have repeatedly said that there’s not enough evidence or scientific information to prove circumcision either reduces a male’s sexuality or increases a male’s sexuality (http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm). The medical problems that have occurred over the years are caused from faulty procedures, unskilled surgeons, unsafe practices, previous damage/mutations (not from circumcision), and etc… Circumcision has also been proven to reduce a person’s chance from getting STDs and HIV infections by as much as fifty percent. Though, I must note that the study isn’t complete. The problem with current circumcision is there’s never really been a real supreme effort to make safer procedures (according to age and condition) and give the proper materials to prevent short-term and long-term complications. Circumcision complications are preventable and could be dramatically reduced if real effort was made. However, people consider either defending the current state of circumcision or want to eliminate it altogether. The next time you (anyone else) wants to look up information on circumcision that’s reading this, I recommend not using search engines, because anyone with money and determination can build a website. Instead, use www.us.gov, www.cdc.gov, www.nih.gov, and other reliable resources (.gov means government). Remember to check the date of what you’re reading to get the right information. I’m an expert on this issue and I hope this clears some of your concerns as well as anyone else reading this. Remember to see your family doctor if you have serious medical issues.
Have an Answer?
You are reading content posted in the Men's Health Community
Top Men's Health Answerers
London, United Kingdom
Indore, India
Southwest , MI
STDs can't be transmitted by casual contact, like hugging or touching.
Syphilis is an STD that is transmitted by oral, genital and anal sex.
Discharge often isn't normal, and could mean an infection or an STD.
Chlamydia, an STI, often has no symptoms, but must be treated.
Bumps in the genital area might be STDs, but are usually not serious.
Get the facts about this disease that affects more than 240,000 men each year.
