I understand why it's so important for your neuro to see you at your worst, or at least on a bad day, when in limbo and seeking a diagnosis. It's too easy to be written off, if they don't see your symptoms, when tests like MRI and LP come back normal.
However, once you do finally get the dreaded diagnosis of MS, do you think it is still important for your neuro to see you on a bad day?
I've become more aware that I would rather have my neuro seeing me when I'm functioning well, when I'm not fatigued and my eyes are aligned and my hand movements are coordinated and I'm not having dizziness. I want to pass the neuro exam with flying colours. It is really disturbing to me during the exam when I know I 'failed' one of the many little tests he puts me through.
I guess it is denial at work, that I am wanting to see in his report that all is well, rather than having my deficits documented and glaring back at me from the written page. However, when I'm in my typically more objective frame of mind, I know that it's best to have the deficits documented, since it is so important to track whether or not my DMD appears to be working or if a more aggressive treatment is warranted. Also I realize that if I go downhill, and off work again, I'm going to need to have the bad stuff documented to support a possible LTD claim down the road.
I suppose I am just not wanting to face even the very idea of progression. Guess I just need to get over it, right?
This is on my mind because I see my neuro next week, for the first time since my last big relapse in April. I really want it to go well and be told that I am doing OK. It was at that last appt when he started talking about Novantrone, and expressed concern about how aggressive my disease is for being so early after my diagnosis. I really don't want to have that conversation again, at least for now.....