My 73 year old father was diagnosed with a meningioma in June of 2003 measuring approximatly 4 cm. It's location is in the frontal region on the anterior interhemispheric fissure. (copied from the CT report) It was discovered by an ER physician when we brought my father to the ER due to some acute changes in gait, symptoms of depression and some confusion. At that time we were told by the ER physician and my father's internist that it was nothing to worry about, his problem was primarily blood pressure problems, unmanaged diabetes and depression, so we dismissed it.
Since this time, my father has declined in cognitive and motor functioning. Several personality changes also took place such as extreme decline in activity, sleeping all day and not motivated to do anything. Any attempt to treat this with an anti-depressant was not effective. He has always been noncompliant with his diabetic diet but noticed at Christmas time, he seemed to just gorge himself with food. Weird food combinations and very impulsive.
Most recently he made inappropriate sexual advances toward another family member. Of course we all became extremely alarmed. We have since followed up with a neurosurgeon and plan to have the tumor surgically removed in 3 weeks. I wasn't alarmed until I actually saw the MRI. It was huge. Even to the untrained eye, you knew it didn't belong there.
My question is why was this dismissed in June when he was clearly showing symptoms of frontal lobe syndrome. Even if he weren't showing symptoms, should a tumor this size be treated or removed?
The decision to remove a meningioma is based on size, location, risk of surgery, and symptoms. Therefore without having seen your father in June, I can not comment on whether surgery was an option. Typically larger masses which are causing symptoms would be removed. However, if a patient has other illnesses which makes surgery risky, or the location of the tumor is difficult, then a period of observation may be taken. I hope this answers your question.
Whether it should have been removed in June 2003 is a very tough question indeed, but one thing is for sure: at that time -- in June 2003 -- your father should have at the very least been referred to a neurologist, or more preferably a neurosurgeon. I am very surprised that the ER doctor and the internist didn't have the presence of mind to order the appropriate referral. Since it wasn't emergent at that time, maybe the ER doctor isn't to blame, but the family internist was clearly over his head (beyond his expertise) by attributing possible neurological problems to uncontrolled diabetes and depression. It is good to know that your father is now under the care of a neurosurgeon who knows what he is doing. You can ask him the same question you asked here (why was it dismissed back in June 2003 and whether it should have been removed), but don't be surprised if the answer is less than forthcoming. He will probably say "it's hard to say" or something evasive.
But let me give you a word of advice: in the machinery of modern medicine, it is imperative that you take a proactive role (like you are doing, which is great) in your own care and the care of your loved ones. There is too much -- way too much -- red tape involved everywhere you turn, and oftentimes things do not properly get done and people (lives) fall through the cracks. People get lost in the machine of modern medicine.
Not to shatter anyone's belief in the infallibility of doctors, but everyone should be aware that according to reports published by the Institute of Medicine, JAMA, and the Harvard School of Public Health, anywhere from 44,000 to 180,000 people die each year in America's hospitals due to MEDICAL MISTAKES. Not bad outcomes. Flat-out errors, resulting from miscommunication and carelessness. Two of the biggest culprits are errors in medicine dosages and interactions, and hospital induced infections.
Matter of fact, medical errors are one of the leading causes of death in America today. And these errors are entirely preventable. How about that?
Bottom line: be proactice, be assertive, and don't let the machinery of modern medicine compromise the care of you or your loved ones.
Copyright 1994-2018MedHelp.All rights reserved. MedHelp is a division of Vitals Consumer Services, LLC.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. MedHelp is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.