Hi There,
I had a meniscus tear which I had surgery a few months ago to fix. I then had an accidental injury in which I tripped over a loose wire at work, catching my bad knee under the wire and jolting it, although I did not actually fall over on to my knee. My knee was very sore for quite a few weeks, but now 4 weeks on, it seems okay again. I had an MRI though, as I was concerned that the trip had hurt my knee again, maybe tore it again? I am now struggling to work out what the MRI result means so it would be great of someone could help? This is what the MRI reported:-
"There is persistent linear high signal traversing the posterior third of the medial meniscus- the high signal cleft is slightly wider and has slightly more irregular margins compared to the MRI taken before the knee surgery (the one where they saw the tear and told me I therefore needed surgery)- but the signal is not of fluid signal and this appearance may reflect postsurgical change rather than a residual/recurrent tear"
All other parts of the knee were reported as 'preserved', 'intact' and 'unremarkable'.
Can someone please let me know from reading the above reporting, if they think I have torn or injured my knee again from my accident since my surgery?
I know that the high linear signal generally means something is wrong, such as a tear, but what confuses me is that this high signal could be from postsurgical change. But my first MRI showed this high signal because I had a tear, so surely after the surgery has fixed this, the signal shouldn't be so high still? Yet my second MRI after surgery and after my accident shows slightly higher signal than when I had the tear! Would postsurgical change still cause high signal? Does that sound right to you guys?
I hope someone can help me understand more. Very much appreciated.
Many Thanks :)
Holly