Wikipedia

[bohan54]

This is directed at the folks who are touting an illegal, unproven cancer "treatment" to those of us for whom standard chemo is not working.

Wikipedia says:
The American Cancer Society reports that "[t]here is no reliable scientific evidence that ****** therapy is effective in treating cancer, and the principles behind it are not widely accepted by the medical community. It is not approved for use in the United States." [1] In 1947, the National Cancer Institute reviewed 10 "cures" submitted by ******; however, all of the patients were receiving standard anticancer treatment simultaneously, making it impossible to determine what effect, if any, was due to ******'s therapy.[8] A review of the ****** Therapy by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center concluded: "If proponents of such therapies wish them to be evaluated scientifically and considered valid adjuvant treatments, they must provide extensive records (more than simple survival rates) and conduct controlled, prospective studies as evidence."[7]

[Baba123]

You believe in your research...I believe in my experience and research...not what Wikipedia says.

[henning]

Way to go girl!! What they are doing is very risky to those who are here and who are looking for advise on treatments and information.  And to see that **** can give even just one woman the wrong approach is this dangerous monster.  That stuff dont work, he said it even in his post.  If his wife is so physcially healthy-why does she need someone (mother) to help her?
Penny

[dian07]

Hey, girl.  What is this post about ?
Peace.
dian