Sorry wouldn't let me comment in that thread anymore. Unfortunately the US doesn't have the same rules in every state...it really bothers me. So in both California and WA to what midwives and naturopath have told me, midwives cannot work with ppl with previous csection per state regulations. Just like in WA a naturopath can be your primary caregiver but in California you must go to a doctor for things like shots. Very silly as my naturopath solved problems for me that perplexed my doctor. But I paid for my naturopath completely out of pocket. My insurance said they would cover 70% but then everytime I tried to claim my money back they denied me. My husband and I pay extra for non hmo insurance but since the new health plan it just doesn't seem to help. Also I two years ago was covered as much as my husband and kids but now I am barely covered at all so our out of pocket deductible max is $6,500 and my insurance won't really pay for me until we hit that and unfortunately I was pregnant for two fiscal year times...and for midwives my insurance will never cover more than a certain percentage even if I pass my max deductible. Ugh...tho I think hospital midwives are different for some reason.
Also the state I live in midwifery is very popular and therefore they can charge a lot bc ppl will pay for it. I am sure if I knew where to look I could find cheaper ones as I know some women without insurance went the midwife route. But all my in-network ones are the posh ones lol. And I only looked so into it as I kept being told they couldn't work with csection patients and my sister had to go to a hospital in the end with her midwife and they were very happy when she was able to avoid csection as they said now she can come back to them next time.