Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

elevated psa after laporascopic prostate removal

My husband had laparoscopic prostate removal in April 2004.  The pathology report indicated "marginal".  For over 2 years, the psa was undetected.  In October 2006, psa reading was 0.7 In February, 2007 it remained 0.7  I am extremely concerned with the Dr's advice to wait until June for another psa reading.  I realize that a detected psa following prostate removal is not a good sign.  My questions are...is the fact that the psa was undetected for over 2 years a positive or negative sign?  Is time of essence when considering radiation for recurring prostate cancer?  I am worried beyond belief that he is waiting another two months for possible radiation.  The dr. indicated that sometimes scar tissue can cause an elevated psa following laparoscopic surgery.  Would that not have shown immediately?  Any advice you could provide would be helpful.  Our urologist is qualified and a very skilled surgeon, but I strongly disagree with the "wait and see" approach.  
4 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
242579 tn?1252111171
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL

Some patients who develop elevated PSA (biochemical recurrence) after surgery
have an indolent course and in others the disease  more malignant.

To properly advise you, it is necessary to know the pathological report of the prostate cancer and the stage of the disease.

Consultation with a medical and/or radiation oncologist is advisable.


This answer is not intended and does not substitute for medical advice- the information is for patient education only.


Helpful - 1
Avatar universal
A related discussion, radiation? was started.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
A related discussion, Elevated PSA after radical removal of prostate was started.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Sounds like a bit of remorse towards not opting for the seed implant!  Did your Urologists at least let you have a consult with the local Radiation folks?
Helpful - 0

You are reading content posted in the Prostate Cancer Forum

Popular Resources
A report from Missouri Medicine argues that, despite earlier media coverage, increased omega-3 fatty acid intake does not increase prostate cancer risk.
They got it all wrong: Why the PSA test is imperative for saving lives from prostate cancer
Get the facts about this disease that affects more than 240,000 men each year.
10 prostate cancer misconceptions debunked.
Diet and digestion have more to do with cancer prevention than you may realize
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.