Avatar universal

repeated aggressive TURPs

A medical writer some years ago recommended repeated aggressive TURPs for reducing tumor size after prostate cancer diagnosis .  This was to be a way to avoid the perils of prostate removal or ablation, and while not curing the cancer at least extending the time before metastasis.  It made sense if tumor volume in itself mattered.  Is this recommendation still kicking around?
2 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
Avatar universal
Thank you Dr. Tewari, but for some men the risks attendant to radical prostatectomy are unthinkable.  These men opt for likely shorter lives with assurance, for a few years, of highest quality.  
The idea of "repeated aggressive TURPs" as cancer treatment was presented by Dr. L.P. Sonda in "Second-look prostate resection for incidental carcinoma of the prostate" in Altwein JE, Faul P, Schneider W. (eds.) "Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate", Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1991, pp.109-13.  If Dr. Sonda's idea works at all, it would appeal to the class of men mentioned.  The idea should have been confirmed or disconfirmed by now.  Does your reply mean that Dr. Sonda's idea was disconfirmed or only that the strategy of a whole class of men with prostate cancer is disdained.
Helpful - 0
242579 tn?1252111171
Thank you for your question. TURP is generally used for men who have BPH. The operation can be used in men with prostate cancer who cannot undergo radical prostatectomy before another treatment begins. In the era of early detection, this is often not the case and primary treatment involves radical prostatectomy, robotic or otherwise.

Ash Tewari, MD


This forum is for information only. The contents, such as graphics, images, text, quoted information and all other materials ("Content") are provided for reference only, do not claim to be complete or exhaustive or to be applicable to any particular individual's medical condition. Users should always consult with a qualified and licensed physician or other medical care provider. Users are warned to follow the advice of their physicians without delay regardless of anything read in this forum. The Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute assumes no duty to correct or update the Content nor to resolve or clarify any inconsistent information which may be a part of the Content. Reliance on any Content is solely at the User's risk. This forum may contain health or medically related materials considered sexually explicit. Users are warned that if they may be offended by such Content, an alternate source of information should be found. Publication of information or reference in forum to specific sources such as specific products, procedures, physicians, treatments, or diagnoses are for information only and are not endorsements of the Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute.
Helpful - 0

You are reading content posted in the Prostate Cancer Forum

Popular Resources
A report from Missouri Medicine argues that, despite earlier media coverage, increased omega-3 fatty acid intake does not increase prostate cancer risk.
They got it all wrong: Why the PSA test is imperative for saving lives from prostate cancer
Get the facts about this disease that affects more than 240,000 men each year.
10 prostate cancer misconceptions debunked.
Diet and digestion have more to do with cancer prevention than you may realize
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.