Slightly less than two years ago (late Feb 2002), I had spirometer test -- the very high-tech kind in which you actually sit inside the testing machine. During the first test they did not administer a bronchodilator and took my readings simply as they occurred naturally. The test showed no evidence of obstructive or restrictive lung disease but it was noted that mild upper airway disease seemed evident (basically - asthma).
I had the 2nd spirometer test done just a couple of days ago and my FEV1 dropped from "85%" of predicted, to "69%". My FVC dropped from "82% of predicted, to "71%. With my PEF being a little higher than on the first test, two years ago, the Dr. is saying it could be restrictive lung disease.
The reason this purported drop in my lung function seems so very strange is because my symptoms have not changed and if I had something like pulmonary fibrosis, I should be going down hill rapidly (not happening). I do still have asthma symptoms but for example, I can walk a mile on a walking path, in 25 minutes, without getting out of breath (slightly more breaths afterward, but sloe steady ones).
Everything I have read about COPD, does not state such rapid lung decline in such a short time (the test said my lungs were at "age 85" and I'm just about to turn age 51) ! The PA who did the test, which this time was a handheld machine, had me to do the same breathing maneuvers as I did with the test of 2 years ago and I cooperated completely and with the same effort (straining to get the last air out of my lungs with each of the 3 tries).
QUESTIONS: I do not have lung pain, my shortness of breath does not occur at rest or with walking -- so how in the world could I have lung function of an 85 year old? Wouldn't I know this myself, if this was the case (wouldn't my symptoms correlate with such a finding)??