Let's try to work through this. The fact of the matter is that you were protected. At no time, as I read your note, were you inside of your partner without a condom in between the two of you. Thus your exposure should be considered safe and probably was. Why the symptoms you describe indeed are consistent with the ARS, the fact of those symptoms are non-specific and are far more likely to be due to a community acquired non-STD viral infection than to the ARS. Read any 10 posts on this site and you will find that on at least 7 of them we discount symptoms as indicative of HIV. They are just too non-specific. I say this by way of indicating that you should not be concerned becasue of your symptoms, they are unlikely to be related to HIV.
Now, on to your questions about testing. The average time to a positive HIV test is about 2 weeks. At 6 weeks about 95% of tests that are going to become positive will be, at 8 weeks the figure rises to 98-99% and at 12 weeks the figure exceeds 99%. Thus a test, any commercially used HIV blood test, at any time beyond 6 weeks makes the odds of infection in your own case vanishingly rare (because your exposure was protected).
PEP? Forget it. PEP's impact is greater when it is started sooner, preferably less than 48 hours after exposure. More than two weeks beyond the exposure is of little help.
I hope these comment help. EWH
Thanks for your help. It seems to me that I was protected the whole time. That's why I didn't seek medical advice immediately after the encounter. I had totally put the event out of my mind until I was suddenly struck down with this chronic flu. It just seems too much like a coincidence that it started exactly 14 days later. It's not psychosomatic as I didn't know anything about ARS until I started researching the symptoms. I will get tested at 6 weeks I guess and go from there. Thanks again.
I understand your apprehension. It is most likely by far however that the timing was just bad luck. Your test will be negative. Please let us know about the results
EWH