Welcome to the STD forum. I'll try to help.
The first need here is to confirm whether or not your "paper-cut" lesions in fact are due to herpes. Most likely they are not, for at least 3 reasons: 1) Almost no genital herpes causes outbreaks more often than once every 4-6 weeks, and for HSV-1 the usual course averages only 1 outbreak per year, and many people have no recurrent episodes at all . 2) Although "paper cut" lesions can occur, they are not the norm; most herpes starts with typical blisters, especially when patients are on the lookout and watching closely. 3) Continued recurrence on acyclovir is very unusual -- although acyclovir-resistant strains can occur, they are very rare, especially for an early infection. (Resistance usually develops in people with longstanding herpes, i.e. several years duration.) Each of these factors individually argues strongly against herpes as the cause; and taken together, it is exceedingly unlikely that herpes is the cause of these lesions.
To the specific questions:
1) Your instinct about seeing a dermatologist as the next step is exactly right, or perhaps an STD specialist. I don't know specific persons, but Boston is perhaps the most medically sophisticated city in the country and it should be easy to find someone. You could ask your primary doc for a referral. Alternatively, any of the academic hospitals' clinics would be a good starting point -- Boston City Hospital, Mass General, the Brigham, etc. (Maybe the Brigham would be the best bet, with its women's/gyn emphasis.)
Whoever you see, you should ask him or her to provide swabs and vials so you can collect a couple of specimens yourself within a few hours of onset of the next "paper cut" to test for HSV, preferably by PCR test (polymerase chain reaction). I suggest you stop taking acyclovir now (or at least discuss this with the doc who prescribed it), so that you have been off treatment for at least a couple of weeks when you see the consultant.
2) The "dose" of the virus, i.e. the intensity of the initial exposure, probably has no effect on the severity of the initial symptoms or on frequency of recurrence. This has not been well researched, but most experts believe it makes no difference.
3) Since your symptoms probably aren't due to herpes, the strength of your immunity against HSV probably is irrelevant. Anyway, even in proved herpes, the frequency of outbreaks is not believed to be due to abnormalities of the immune system.
4) This too probably is irrelevant, certainly until the diagnosis is confirmed. In any case I am unaware of any current ongoing trials of new herpes treatments, in the Boston area or anywhere else.
Please report back once you have seen a consultant, and/or whenever a definite diagnosis is confirmed.
Best wishes-- HHH, MD
Dear Doctor Handsfield,
Thanks sincerely for these very helpful responses. I'll report back once I have see a dermatologist, STD specialist, or other provider.
If you have trouble finding a suitable specialist, another option is to contact the Westover Heights Clinic of Portland, OR (http://www.westoverheights.com). WHC is directed by Terri Warren, who moderates MedHelp's herpes forum. Terri would agree the best approach is to have a personal, herpes-knowledgeable provider. But if that can't be worked out, sometimes WHC will develop a long distant relationship with patients and can provide them with the materials to self-test for HSV along the lines I suggested above.