You are infected with HSV-1, like half the US population. You probably have had it since childhood. Your HSV-2 result is weakly positive, but at such a low level that it probably doesn't mean anything.
The HSV blood test cannot pick up an infection acquired only 11 days previously. But as I said above, you cannot catch HSV-2 by fellatio, so it doesn't matter. Unless you develop symptoms of herpes, you don't need any further testing.
It is rare to catch HSV-2 by receiving oral sex, if it occurs at all. This is because oral infection with HSV-2 is uncommon. In addition, HSV-2 antibody cannot develop in under 10 days. (The testing staff were dead wrong about tests becoming positive within 72 hours of infection. No way.) Therefore, if your HSV-2 antibody test in fact is positive, your infection did not come from the oral sex episode on May 29.
It would be helpful to know more detail about your positive HSV-2 test result. I'm not sure what the testing staff meant about "nonspecific" test results. Most labs and herpes-knowledbeable clinicians now use the newer, truly type specific antibody tests. However, false positive results for HSV-2 can still occur, and maybe that is what they meant. In particular, if your HSV-2 result is low positive (i.e., with an ELISA ratio between 1.1 and 3.4), it might be false.
It sounds like you might have gone to a testing service that you found online or in the phone book. If so, it was a bad move. It's always better to see a knowledgeable clinician. Such a person would have recommended against many of the tests you had, as I would have. It was a waste of money and energy to be tested for hepatitis of any type (Hep C isn't even sexually transmitted, except occasionally between gay men); and it was too soon to test for HSV, syphilis, or HIV. On top of that, since you apparently took the Augmentin before you were tested, your tests for gonorrhea and chlamydia were useless; even if you had been infected, the tests would have been negative. Finally, chlamydia is never acquired by oral sex.
In other words, every single test you had was unnecessary or otherwise invalid. It all could have been avoided if you had instead gone to an STD clinic or other provider with a little knowledge about STDs. On top of that, as I already implied, "testing staff" often provide inaccurate information about the tests they do. Typically they are trained to collect blood and other specimens, and little else.
Back to the original question: Come back with the details of your HSV-1 and HSV-2 test results when you receive them, including the ELISA ratio numbers. Then I will provide more accurate information about whether you are infected with either of those viruses. But for now, you can know that if anything at all turns up positive, it preceded the oral sex event.
And finally, such brief oral exposure -- barely enough to have a little "skin contact" -- probably was zero risk for any infection of any kind. That sort of information also could have been availble through an experienced clinician.
I don't mean to come down on you so hard. But this is an important lesson for all forum users who are interested in STD testing.
Best wishes-- HHH, MD
Dear Doctor,
I wanted to find out what your evaluation from the results I received last Friday.
HSV2 ELISA was 1.29
HSV1 ELISA was 5.26
Exposure was 5/30 blood collected 6/9.
Thanks,
TM4211