Don't be confused. Ignore the result. IgM tests are NOT recommended by any expert group becuae they are often wrong. Their false positve rates are high. EWH
hellow doctor
I am very confused about my results of hsv 1&2 igm.
(Test description-hsv1&2 igm),(value observed-0.35 index value)(biological reference interval- 1.2 index value: positive) (accreditation- ).
method elisa
hellow doctor
I am very confused about my results of hsv 1&2 igm.
(Test description-hsv1&2 igm),(value observed-0.35 index value)(biological reference interval- 1.2 index value: positive) (accreditation- ).
method elisa
Welcome to our Forum. You do not tell us why you had the blood test but unless you had a reason better than "just to check up", this is just the reason that neither we nor the CDC recommend routine testing for HSV- the test is just not good enough for use in persons who do not have a very good reason for testing.
Your history is not particualrly suggestive of HSV.
Further, I'm not sure what test was performed on you. Was this a gG-based, type specific test? If not, the results are worthless. If it was a gG-based, type specific test, the odds remain quite high that your test result is a false positive result. IgM tests and index values are morel likely to confuse things than to help.
The best way to sort this out, if these results are for a type specific test, is with repeat testing using another type specific test (we suggest use of the Surview or Biokit assay) or a Western blot test, either of which can be performed on blood and do not require a swab or a lesion to be present. The Western blot assay performed at the University of Washington is currently considered the most accurate HSV blood test. Most labs will send specimens there for testing which can take several weeks.
I hope these comments are helpful. EWH