LGV is an exceedingly rare STD in all countries and has never been known to be transmitted by oral sex. But yes: presumably the standard chlamydia drugs like azithromycin would successfully prevent LGV in exposed persons.
Stop worrying about this exposure -- and stay safe (i.e. use condoms) if and when you have other extramarital exposures.
That will be all for this thread.
Hi Doc,
Thanks for the response. That's what I thought as well - i.e. not logical to get an std in this manner.
It was really the pain in the groin nodes that got me worried (the hemmorrhoids were just something that happened at the same time and the urethral discomfort was probably magnified by my worrying). Thats why I got to thinking of maybe the condom wasn't intact, she touched her vagina before touching my penis while putting on the condom, etc.
Out of curiousity, since LGV is a chlamydial infection, wouldn't the azithromycin I took theoretically also be effective against that (even though no prophylaxis in indicated for it)?
Welcome to the STD forum. Responding only to the opening line of your question, before I read anything else: It is absolutely, totally impossible to acquire any STD from condom-protected oral sex. If that is your only potential exposure, then there is no risk and you do not need testing -- regardless of the details that follow when I go on to read your question.
And now I have done that. Guess what? You didn't need the STD medications, and your symptoms cannot possibly be due to an STD from the exposure described. In addition to the impossibility of transmission through an intact condom, no infection (STD or otherwise) can start to cause symtoms less than 24 hours after exposure. To your questions:
1) This sounds mostly like an emotional reaction, magnifying what may be normal body sensations. No STD causes such symptoms.
2) There is no point in being tested for STDs.
3) If you had been exposed (because of the condom, you were not), the antibiotics you received would have prevented gonorrhea, chlamydia, nongonococcal urethritis (NGU), and syphilis.
4) No prophylaxis is indicated for those STDs.
5) You were not at risk for HIV and do not need testing for it.
6) No distant online expert can guarantee someone isn't infected. But if this is your only potential STD exposure, you can safely have unprotected sex with your wife.
7) There is no need for HSV testing on account of this exposure. But if you feel you might have HSV from a prior exposure, the local IgG test probably is just fine. Ask whether it is a truly type-specific test; if so, it will be fine; you don't necessarily need the HerpeSelect test. However, please do NOT have an IgM test. The HSV IgM tests are highly unreliable and often misleading.
8) There is no test for HPV.
Please put this event into perspective. There simply is no STD risk. Let's not have any ongoing "yes but" or "what if" questions. There is nothing you can add that would change my opinion or advice.
Regards-- HHH, MD
The ** refers to oral sex....