There is a chance that your cultures for STaph will be negative because of the antibiotics you are taking. that would be OK if the keflex is making them better however.
As for syphilis, you are correct that the chancre can occasionally be overlooked but it is far more often missed when syphilis occurs in other locations. I doubt that you would have missed a lesion and predict that your syphilis test will be negative. EWH
Dr Hook,
Thanks for your response. I am now awaiting my Syphilis test results. Before getting the test I went to see my GP about the sores on my arms and he thinks they are staph and prescribed a week of Keflex, so I had been taking Keflex for almost a week before taking the test (the sores seem to be unaffected). Will this affect the test result or potentially give a false negative?
Also, a question about initial chancre. Often I hear that these can go unnoticed. Can the initial chancre be faint and almost unnoticeable when presenting on the penis?
Thanks
The likelihood that you got syphilis from the exposure you describe is most unlikely. You were protected and condoms prevent syphilis transmission. In addition, the lesion you describe really does not sound like a primary syphilis lesion. Thus, form the outset, I would predict with confidence that your syphilis blood test will be negative.
But what if it was? While I think this is unlikely, the fact is that a rash of secondary syphilis can take on just about any appearance, form a rash only involving the hands and soles of the feet or a diffuse rash all over the entire body. There are many exceptions to a "classical" rash of secondary syphilis..
Finally, with regard to the duration that a rash can persist for several months. Six months would be really unusual however. It is more likely that your rash is due to something other than syphilis.
Bottom line, your chances of having syphilis are close to zero. No harm in getting a test however. EWH