There is little point in being tested after a single such exposure. There is no test for asymptomatic HPV infection, so that's not a consideration. All you can do is wait and see if you develop genital warts.
There are no data on per-exposure transmission risk for either infection and I wouldn't even speculate, except to say it is rare for herpes (if the infected person wasn't having a recognized outbreak) and probably somewhat more common for HPV. The risks probably are somewhat lower for female-to-male transmission than the reverse, especially for HSV, but the difference isn't very great.
The blood test for HSV-2 takes 3 months to become reliably positive. There is no point in testing at 1 week. Sexually active persons generally should be tested routinely for common STDs once a year, especially gonorrhea, chlamydia, and a syphilis blood test. (Some people recommend including HSV-2, but that's controversial.) If you haven't had such testing in the past year, perhaps this would be a good time, but not specifically because of this particular exposure.
Good luck--- HHH, MD
Hey until the doc chimes in, you can't get a blood test for HPV, it's a skin virus. When you say she was "postive" for HPV, did she say she had warts or a recent abnormal pap or Digene HPV DNA test?
No - she just mentioned it was one of two STD's she has. Is transmission of HPV similar to HSV-2 in that it is most likely during active phases and/or outbreaks with warts present?