Eye Care Community
Cataract targets for lenses, my opinion, no question
About This Community:

This patient support community is for discussions relating to eye care, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal detachment, eye infections, misaligned eyes, intra-ocular implants, refractive surgery (LASIK and CK), glasses, contact lenses, amblyopia, eye injuries, dry eyes, ocular allergy, eye pain and discomfort, pediatric eye disorders, eyelid and tearduct surgery, poor eyesight, and eye surgery.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Cataract targets for lenses, my opinion, no question

For those who are trying to decide what to target for monovision, minimonovision, I will share my opinion as to what I find best. If you are doing one eye only go for plano. Two eyes plano in dominant eye and .75 or 1.0 for the other. I have had both my eyes done and by trying many different lens combinations post surgery, I really like the plano/1.0 combo best. With this I see clearly from distant to just about the tip of my fingers on an outstretched hand and arm and can read pretty fine print (1/16). I wouldn't read books for any lengthy time without glasses though. I didn't like the plano/1.25 combo because I can notice a fuzzy part in the distance where the halfway part of the focus is. Keep 2 things in mind when trying to decide. For each 0.1 diopter change from plano, the distance in focus gets increasingly smaller. It is not linear. Two because my both doctors missed the targets by .75 and 1.0 you may just want to shoot for plano for both. Most of my vision world is in focus. Monovision or mini mono in the other direction close/intermediate does not do it.
Related Discussions
2 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
Avatar_m_tn
Oh, the lens combos refers to glasses. Also to add, I have 2 Technis aspheric lenses implanted. I didn't choose Crystalens because of  the risks involved. I had 20/20 vision with .5 astigmatism in both eyes prior to cataracts. There is a loss in vision as compared to my previous vision as to the wide range of focus I enjoyed previously, but I don't know today that I would choose Crystalens if I were faced with the same decision. Depth perception is off a tiny bit because I notice that if I were to try to grab a hair in the mirror with a tweezer I don't always grab it. But that is the only time I had noticed it. Depth perception is a product of how well both eyes focus on an object. I can't say that the ability to focus with the .5 diopter change that the Crytalens could do (per a post 1 1/2 or so years ago, it may be better today) would be worth the risks. Just my thoughts. Good luck to you.
Blank
711220_tn?1251894727
I would not agree with your conclusions.

Dr. O.
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Blank
Weight Tracker
Weight Tracker
Start Tracking Now
Eye Care Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
233488_tn?1310696703
Blank
Marathon Running Done Over Many Yea...
May 21 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
233488_tn?1310696703
Blank
New Article on Multifocal IOL vs &q...
May 21 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
748543_tn?1371753642
Blank
TMJ/TMJ The Connection Between Teet...
Jan 27 by Hamidreza Nassery , DMD, FICOI, FAGDBlank
Top Eye Care Answerers
177275_tn?1438375244
Blank
JohnHaganMD
Kansas City, MO
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
CBCT
Trumbull, CT
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
Anomalychick
Jacksonville, FL
Avatar_n_tn
Blank
DonW66
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
KayakerNC
NC
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
west98671