Eye Care Community
Cataract targets for lenses, my opinion, no question
About This Community:

This patient support community is for discussions relating to eye care, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal detachment, eye infections, misaligned eyes, intra-ocular implants, refractive surgery (LASIK and CK), glasses, contact lenses, amblyopia, eye injuries, dry eyes, ocular allergy, eye pain and discomfort, pediatric eye disorders, eyelid and tearduct surgery, poor eyesight, and eye surgery.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Cataract targets for lenses, my opinion, no question

For those who are trying to decide what to target for monovision, minimonovision, I will share my opinion as to what I find best. If you are doing one eye only go for plano. Two eyes plano in dominant eye and .75 or 1.0 for the other. I have had both my eyes done and by trying many different lens combinations post surgery, I really like the plano/1.0 combo best. With this I see clearly from distant to just about the tip of my fingers on an outstretched hand and arm and can read pretty fine print (1/16). I wouldn't read books for any lengthy time without glasses though. I didn't like the plano/1.25 combo because I can notice a fuzzy part in the distance where the halfway part of the focus is. Keep 2 things in mind when trying to decide. For each 0.1 diopter change from plano, the distance in focus gets increasingly smaller. It is not linear. Two because my both doctors missed the targets by .75 and 1.0 you may just want to shoot for plano for both. Most of my vision world is in focus. Monovision or mini mono in the other direction close/intermediate does not do it.
Related Discussions
2 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
Avatar_m_tn
Oh, the lens combos refers to glasses. Also to add, I have 2 Technis aspheric lenses implanted. I didn't choose Crystalens because of  the risks involved. I had 20/20 vision with .5 astigmatism in both eyes prior to cataracts. There is a loss in vision as compared to my previous vision as to the wide range of focus I enjoyed previously, but I don't know today that I would choose Crystalens if I were faced with the same decision. Depth perception is off a tiny bit because I notice that if I were to try to grab a hair in the mirror with a tweezer I don't always grab it. But that is the only time I had noticed it. Depth perception is a product of how well both eyes focus on an object. I can't say that the ability to focus with the .5 diopter change that the Crytalens could do (per a post 1 1/2 or so years ago, it may be better today) would be worth the risks. Just my thoughts. Good luck to you.
Blank
711220_tn?1251894727
I would not agree with your conclusions.

Dr. O.
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Go
MedHelp Health Answers
Blank
Sleep On It
Sleep log and alarm clock
Download Now
Top Eye Care Answerers
1932338_tn?1349223998
Blank
Luvtoski
Seattle
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Craig10x
New York, NY
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
dan2233
chicago
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
JackM829
Chicago, IL
Avatar_n_tn
Blank
DonW66
RSS Expert Activity
1741471_tn?1349564002
Blank
Parkinson Awareness Month: Parkinso... Blank
May 10 by Michael Gonzalez-WallaceBlank
233488_tn?1310696703
Blank
NEW STUDIES ON PREVENTING PROGRESSI...
May 08 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
2126606_tn?1346348724
Blank
Heroin Use in the U.S.
May 08 by Clare Waismann Kavin, Blank