I had cataract surgery about six weeks ago. It seems that the surgeon had difficulty implanting the intra-ocular lens as I had been taking Flomax. He stopped the procedure to get my permission to use a more flexible lens to which I agreed.
The procedure was completed. On follow up two weeks later my vision had not resolved (blurred) and the surgeon advised that there was an inflamation which he hoped would go away with heavy application of Maxidex eye drops.
It did not and on subsequent examination he advised that the vitreous gel was seeping around the lens and obscuring the pupil. He said that the lens was correctly located and the capsule intact. He proposed to treat it conservatively for another few weeks and if not resolved to do a simple procedure to "suck out" the gel. When I inquired if he had used a different surgical procedure based on the fact that he knew I was on Flomax he replied that he had not.
I sought another opinion and the second opthomologist after examining the eye stated he was unable to find a lens and that the capsule was absolutely ruptured. He thought it might be possible that the capsule was intact when the first durgeon last saw me (3 weeks earlier) and had ruptured afterwards with lens then receding into the vitreous gel so as to not be readily visible.
My questions are as follows:
1. Can the situation be rectified and with what anticipated result.
2. What generally would the procedure be in layman's terms.
3. If the capsule is ruptured and cannot be repaired how is the lens held in place and is this satisfactory.
4. If the vitreous gel has to be removed is there any "downside" long term.
5. What type of opthamologist should do this type of procedure.
6. Is there any urgency in doing the second procedure
7. Did the original surgeon make mistakes. If so generally what were they.
This discussion is related to
Capsule rupture during cateract surgery.