I'm scheduled for cataract surgery next month and was very sorry and dismayed to read about the difficulties Laura4 has had after her surgery.
My cataract surgeon has recommended the acrysof toric lens to me as well. I mentioned to him my apprehension after reading the posts by Laura4. His opinion is that these difficulties unfortunately can occur with any type of IOL and are not more prone to occur with the toric lenses. (He also mentioned that, if Laura4 was going to change the lens, she should try one from a different manufacturer because they all have different ways of making their lenses and a different method may be more suited to her eyes.)
Because my 1.5 D astigatism is on the borderline for the toric lens, I think he would be willing to use an aspheric lens with limbal relaxing incisions, although he says that the LRI are not very precise and sometimes grow back in.
I would really appreciate any futher thoughts regarding the toric lenses. At this point, I'm leaning towards the aspheric lenses because being conservative seems less scary. (The cataract surgery is being done mainly because pyterigia in both eyes have made it very uncomfortable to wear contact lenses and glasses don't correct my high myopia very well. An ERM peel will probably be done on the right eye soon after the cataract surgery, so the cataract would have progressed quickly in any case.)
Thank-you very much. This is a great forum - for the information given and shared and for encouraging people to keep looking for solutions.
Toric IOLs have all the problems of regular IOLs PLUS if they rotate off axis they have to be repositioned or removed. They have the advantage of giving better vision without glasses in an eye with astigmatism.
From what I have read and heard from other doctors, the toric has a statistically higher chance of having the kinds of problems I've been describing....negative dysphotopsia and other higher order aberrations - glare and halos I think come under that category. It would be good to have this backed here by professional opinion.
What I have been hearing is that the new wavefront technology is offering better lenses, but it is also new technology. Can you wait a year or so before doing surgery? This will give time to see what new technology is available.
With my Toric I choose to have my vision more clear for distance, and it is true that it is more crisp than it was, but it was not really bad to begin with. Sone of the crispness is also from having the fogginess of the cataract removed. My reading distance is not as good as before. I wasn't really thinking, because the small astigmatism I had at 1 diopter was easily fixed with only 1.5 reading glasses from the drug store and I still have to use reading glasses after surgery with the Toric. These are all things to consider for low astigmatism. If I had to do it again I would have done the LRI and gone with a technis aspheric IOL.
Although the Alcon Acrysof toric lens has only been around for about 2 years, there's a silicone toric lens that has been used for at least a decade. The AcrySof toric is reported to provide better vision than the older toric lens because it has less of a tendency to rotate in the eye. In the clinical trials, the AcrySof toric did a significantly better job of correcting astigmatism than limbal relaxing incisions. (I guess it's possible that the surgeons participating in the clinical trials are a more skilled group than other practicing surgeons, which would make the results of the clinical trials uninterpretable.)
From everything I've read, negative dysphotopsia is more common with acrylic (as opposed to silicone) lenses. Laura4, that's why I thought that you'd probably be happier with the silicone version of Tecnis lens, manufactured by AMO. (The Tecnis lens is also made in acrylic.)
Laura4, it sounds like you were myopic before cataract surgery. If your target was good distance vision, it's normal and expected for your distance vision to improve and your close vision to be less sharp post-surgery.
I would have gotten the AcrySof toric lens if it had come in a power sufficient to correct my high myopia. So I got aspheric lenses and LRI's instead, with excellent results. My advice to others would be to choose a skilled and experienced surgeon, get his/her recommendations, and do some research on your own before deciding. It doesn't hurt to get recommendations from more than one surgeon before proceeding.
Thank-you for the helpful information , Dr. Hagen, Laura4 and JodieJ.
Laura4, thanks also for the suggestion to wait for the new technology. Unfortunately, I'm not able to wait very long.
It's pretty challenging right now to work (in an office), drive, cook, etc. with thick glasses that don't correct my vision very well. I'm being extra-cautious (slow) and checking everything 2 or 3 times.
(Also, my right eye vision has been distorted for awhile by an epiretinal membrane - scar tissue resulting from being very myopic. Lately, the left eye has also been more affected - as if I'm looking through finely texturized plastic, sometimes with a white haze as well. Despite this, my eye chart vision is not that bad, R: 20/60 and L: 20/40.)
I'm hoping that, after the cataract surgery, it will be like having contact lenses in my eyes - even though I'm expecting to still wear lighter glasses for both reading and distance actiivities like driving.
Laura4, I think JodieJ is right that it would be normal for you to still need reading glasses if you chose to have your distance vision more clear. I'm making the same choice. It would be so nice to be able to walk around outside without glasses - which wouldn't be possible if I chose to have my close vision more clear. Like you, I'm already in the habit of having a pair of drugstore readers handy for when I sit down to read.
Best of luck to you, Laura4, in deciding what to do - and with the outcome too. Please let us know how you are doing. I'll report back too.
Just want to clarity that I did expect to wear reading glasses post surgery with the Toric. My distance vision was actually fairly good - just a little bit fuzzy. I thought that by clearing up the small amount of astigmatism (1 diopter), the crispness of distance vision would return. At least this was how it was explained to me.
If I did not have the negative dysphotopsia and other higher order aberrations the Toric does create crisp distance vision. If you decide to go with the Toric I hope you do not have these other problems. My surgeon at first said that they were rare, now he says they are quite common.
I'm amazed by the amount of anxiety I have around the vision stress with these complications. As a landscape designer and naturalist (also muscian) my identity and sense of groundedness was very much through my vision - walking, checking out trees and sky. I'll soon be leading an interfaith walk called "Meet the Trees". It's a large event. Last time I focused on a branch in a tree the limbs below it went into double vision. When driving the letters on signs at a specific distance and angle jump in and out of double vision. Almost every day at some point I break down from the stress of it. Actually sent email to 6 eye surgeons at Scheie Institute today. Not giving up.
I also had an epiretinal membrane (a layer of scar tissue causing wrinkling of the macula), so I've done quite a lot of research about this condition. Cataract surgery will absolutely not correct the distortion caused by an ERM. In fact, a multifocal IOL like ReZoom or ReStor will make the distortion MUCH worse. (Check out the remarks of Dr. Michael Wong of Princeton by entering "ReStor IOL intermediate vision woes" in the search feature of this website. His comments appear down the thread.)
You can get a preview of what your post-surgery vision would be like with ReStor/ReZoom by looking thru a RGP multifocal contact lens. Before my retinal surgery, the zones of vision in a multifocal contact interacted with my macular wrinkling to produce one big blur in a eye that could read the 20/50 line with a regular contact.
What is your best corrected vision with glasses alone (no contacts)? This is probably as good as you will get with the best monofocal implants, if everything goes perfectly.
If your ERM is affecting your vision significantly, you might consider having retinal surgery to peel it. This procedure restored the vision in my affected eye to 20/20+ (although I still have some residual distortion.) (Un)fortunately, having a vitrectomy causes a cataract to develop. In my case, this turned out to be a blessing in disguise--the cataract surgery eliminated my high myopia, and my insurance covered the entire bill.
I really don't think that some ophthalmologists understand the disproportionate anxiety that vision problems can create. The double vision that I had for several months (prior to having strabismus surgery) had me so stressed out that it impaired my ability to do simple tasks For example, I had gotten the book-on-tape version of a popular novel from the library, but my concentration was so poor that I couldn't follow the story. The reader might as well have been speaking Urdu--the book just made no sense to me, even after replaying the first tape several times. (The day after my strab surgery, which eliminated my double vision, the book made perfect sense.)
Laura, I think your anxiety is normal, given your symptoms. Hopefully, they will soon be resolved, and you can put an end to this chapter.
I just re-read your post and realize that you're thinking about getting a toric lens rather than ReStor/ReZoom. So scratch my comments--but I do have another concern. I think that having a vitrectomy with ERM peeling might affect your astigmatism, especially if the newer sutureless vitrectomy equipment isn't used. (My astigmatism axis was not the same after retinal surgery.) Maybe you should get an opinion from a retinal surgeon about how this might affect your vision with a toric lens.
I'm gIad that having to wear reading glasses post-cataract surgery was not unexpected for you.
Re-reading your March 16 post, I would just mention that I think reading glasses only correct presbyopia (the far-sightedness that most people get in their 40's), and not astigmatism (irregular curvature of the eye) which is corrected by a toric lens, limbal relaxing incisions, etc. I don't have any special knowledge in this field, as you can see from my posts, so I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong.
It's helpful to know that your surgeon says that visual aberrations are quite common with toric lenses. That would be a good reason for me to choose an aspheric lens if possible.
I can really identify with your feelings of anxiety. It must be incredibly stressful to try to always carry on calmly, even be a leader of a big event, with double vision jumping out at you. Like you, I'm trying to keep up all my usual activities but it feels overwhelming at times. Even making Easter dinner for family will be difficult and I don't want them to feel my stress. Luckily, my hobby of ballroom dancing doesn't require good vision. Often, I just feel like not going anywhere and not seeing anyone - which is what convinces me that I have to have the surgery and keep searching for solutions - not give up, as you say.
If I have the choice, I will probably ask for an aspheric lens rather than a toric lens to reduce the possibility of visual aberrations - although the aspheric lens my cataract surgeon recommends is the Alcon IQ which is also acrylic. I don't think I could handle aberrations like Laura4 is dealing with on top of the distortions I already have and facing retinal surgery.
I did see my retinal surgeon who said it was fine with him if I have the catarct surgery first. He said that he will likely do an ERM peel of the R eye after cataract surgery has been done on both eyes, but he didn't mention anything about this changing the astigmatism. If he does use the sutureless vitrectomy equipment, does that mean that the ERM peel should not affect the astigmatism?
Do you know whether astigmatism changes a lot from not wearing contact lenses in preparation for cataract surgery? For many years, my astigmatism has been -2.5 in my R eye and none in my L eye. Now, after a few months of not wearing my contacts, I'm told that it is -1.5 in each eye. Perhaps cataract surgeons measure astigmatism differently?
I'm also experiencing slight double vision (strabismus?) which I've mainly noticed when sitting in the dark watching a play - there are two of each person on the stage. So will have to look into that at some point as well.
It's immensely reassuring to me, and I'm sure to Laura4 also, that you've dealt with your vision problems successfully.
My vitrectomy involved sutures, which caused some inflammation before dissolving. The amount of my astigmatism stayed the same post-surgery, but the axis got shifted enough to affect my vision with my old glasses. (I could only see well out of my affected eye if I took the glasses off and twisted them.) I'm guessing that a sutureless vitrectomy would be less likely to affect astigmatism--but it's definitely a question that requires a professional response. (I believe that the astigmatism axis is important with either a toric lens or LRIs.)
Not wearing contacts does indeed affect corneal measurements. The numbers are plugged into a complicated formula used to determine the power of your IOL.
I also have Alcon IQ lenses, and I've never had the type of symptoms that Laura describes. Many retinal surgeons prefer that their patients get acrylic (rather than silicone) lenses--mine did. Because Alcon's toric lens is relatively new, there probably isn't much data available about the incidence of negative dysphotopsia. However, if Laura's doctors state that there is an association, that would be a red flag in my mind.
I saw my 2nd opinion doctor yesterday and I he said that the word aberration - which I've been using - is mostly used with problems following lasek surgery. What I have is negative dysphotopsia (just the dark shadow on temporal side of vision), and positive dysphtopsia (the glare, halos, light flickering) and then the now existing imbalance between eyes which causes some of the wet look. This last part was encouraging since it will be possible to correct the imbalance.
Just trying to improve my technical language here. Dr. John, hope my understanding is correct.
I have one other technical question. If the lowest powered Toric lens has a 1.5 correction, what does that mean for someone with only ,80 diopter of atigmatism. I now have the correct number for my pre surgical astigmatism. That's nothing compared to what Jodie has been describing.
If you have .8 diopter of astigmatism and you put a 1.5 in the eye you will be over corrected by .7 diopter. SO you are not a candidate for a toric IOL. By putting the surgical incision on the steep axis of the cornea, making the incision a little wider than usual and using a lot of steroid eye drops the surgeon should be able to cure about .5 diopters.
You must be relieved to receive some good news about the feeling of imbalance. I hope it will be helpful to you in deciding whether to replace the toric lens.
With respect to Dr. Hagen's comments about astigmatism, is it possible that measuring this is not an exact matter? I'm wondering this because you might be concerned about possibly being over-corrected.
(The cataract surgeon told me about a week ago that my right eye had 1.5 D. astigmatism but the optometrist said today that it is 2.0 D. However, in my case this could be because retinal scarring makes it difficult for me to answer consistently - when they ask which of two lenses give a better picture.)
The only reason given for both the negative and positive dysphotopsia is the usual answer - it can sometimes happen.
I hope I am understanding the technology of these Toric lenses. I believe there are 3 models in 3 different powers. Mine was the lowest, an SN60T3. If Dr. Hagan is correct, and it's not possible to do more adjustment of the power from the 1.5 of my model than it would be true that I would not medically have been a candidate for even the lowest power Toric. But I still am not sure of my technical understanding. I was also told that a 1.5 would adjust back to a 1.0. Even so, that's crazy if I only had .80 to begin with.
.8 D of astigmatism is very little, and it could have been corrected with a limbal relaxing incision, as Dr. Hagan stated. My technical knowledge about toric lenses is limited, but I remember reading an article someplace about determining which toric lens to use. I'll try to find it again. Would it be possible to safely explant your toric lens?
In early April, I'll see with my cataract surgeon to decide on the type of lens. I would like to ask you a few more questions, if you have time to consider them.
Just to summarize things I've already mentioned:
My prescription is high, pupils are small and astigmatism in my left eye is -1.5 and in my right eye is between -1.5 and -2. I won't be able to wear contact lenses afterwards because of pterygia. Lately, I've been seeing more distortion and a smaller image in my R eye with some double vision - but hopefully this will be improved with an ERM peel after the cataract surgery.
My cataract surgeon has recommended a toric lens because it would correct the astigmatism without LRI and without wearing glasses all the time. He says he has implanted many of them since last year. However, he'd probably be quite willing to use another lens as he says I'm borderline.
In a 2007 post, Jodie mentioned that the aspheric lenses work better with larger pupils and that they improve contrast sensitivity and distance vision. She also mentioned that near and intermediate vision are not as good as with a conventional lens but that was not important to her because she planned to wear multi-focal contacts post-surgery.
Here are my questions:
- Because of my small pupils and inability to wear contacts, do you think I would be better with just a conventional lens rather than an aspheric one?
- With either an aspheric or a conventional lens, I would have LRI or wear glasses all the time. Would LRI be risky for me because of a previous HSV infection?
- If I did get a toric lens, would my small pupils make me less prone to dysphotopsia?
- On the other hand, would my high prescription or other factors make me more prone to it?
- Are there any particular questions I should ask my cataract surgeon?
Thanks very much for reading this long post and for considering my questions.
Naoye, as far as I can determine, Alcon's Acrysof toric iol is still only available in a limited spherical power range (16.0 D to 25.0 D). If you are very myopic and wanting to correct your vision for distance, it is extremely unlikely that anything in this range would work for you. So you might not even be a candidate for the toric lens. (For comparison, I was about -6.75 D and needed a 14.0 D lens--lower numbers correct more myopia.)
Laura4, according to Alcon's toric power calculator, the 1.50 D toric model is supposed to be appropriate for eliminating between .75D and 1.50D of astigmatism. So I guess you were in the range (but barely).
You definitely don't sound like a candidate for the Acrysof toric lens. And although the aspheric lens represents the latest technology in monofocal IOLs, the few independent studies I uncovered failed to demonstrate the benefits of an aspheric lens over a conventional one. Instead, they showed that most people who have a conventional lens in one eye and an aspheric in the other eye can't tell the difference. I predict that you'll be very pleased with your surgery results with either; it's really great not to be burdened with high myopia.
Thank-you, Jodie. What you say confirms what I've been thinking in the last few days - that I should ask my surgeon about a conventional lens.
I hope you don't mind if I ask you also about the aniseikonia that you had after your ERM surgery. I've been trying to research this and other matters in posts on this site and also on Google but don't have your great ability to distill the (often contradictory) information into practical conclusions. Also, I think the matters you've had to deal with are very similar to mine.
I think my right eye has retinally-induced aniseikonia from an ERM (smaller image, double vision). I'm hoping that this will be at least partly corrected by an ERM peel that will likely be done a few months after the cataract surgery. Do you think it's ok to just ignore the aniseikonia for now?
However, in the cataract surgery, should I aim for plano for both eyes because of the aniseikonia - rather than the slight weakening (-.5 and -.75) I'm considering to preserve some intermediate vision? (I think you said that you requested plano for both eyes because of double vision and eye muscle problems but am not sure whether this was double vision related to your aniseikonia.)
Thanks for your cheerful prediction too, Jodie. I'm sure you're right about freedom from high myopia. I can't imagine being able to wake up and see without correction. Even if my vision is not perfect it's bound to be better than the coke-bottle glasses I've been wearing for 3 months.
Aniseikonia secondary to an ERM is described in the medical literature as a "not uncommon" problem. It's been hypothesized that the wrinkling of the macula changes the photoreceptor distribution, thereby altering the image size in the affected eye. Surgery to peel the ERM doesn't necessarily fix the image size problem or the associated symptoms (e.g., headaches, double vision, etc.). Through email correspondence, Dr. Steve Charles (a retinal surgeon in Memphis, TN) suggested to me that peeling the ILM during ERM surgery might be beneficial in that regard. If you have an image size disparity before surgery, I'd strongly advise you to discuss this with your retinal specialist. Dr. Charles is well-known nationally, and I'm sure that he'd be willing to communicate with your doctor about the potential value of including an ILM peeling in your procedure. (BTW, few retinal surgeons relate to the term "aniseikonia"; they seem to have their own vocabulary. But if you describe the image size problem, they'll understand.)
Dr. Gerard de Wit of the Netherlands is (at least in my opinion) a world authority on retinally-induced aniseikonia. His website at opticaldiagnostics dot com contains lots of info about this condition and its treatment with corrective lenses. There's also an aniseikonia support group on yahoo with good info.
My double vision happened before I developed the ERM. It was caused by the breakdown of a phoria secondary to monovision contact lens wear, so I didn't want to risk even modified monovision post cataract surgery. It might actually be a good idea for you to determine the cause of your double vision before you have cataract surgery; you'd have to see a pediatric/strabismus ophthalmologist. (It's probably, but not certainly, related to the ERM.)
I hope my references don't get censored; this website discourages links to other sources of info. If they do get deleted or you have other questions, send me a personal message.
Jodie, thank-you for your message and comprehensive information. I'm happy too that your references were not censored.
My retinal surgeon did say that he would remove the ILM. I think this reduces the chances of recurrence of the ERM. If it might also correct the aniseikonia, that would be a a real bonus.
I'll try to see a pediatric/strabismus ophthamologist - hopefully they can fit me in before the cataract surgery. I also wore contact lenses with monovision (until recently developing pterigia - which is why the cataract surgery is being done first) so it would be good to rule out other causes such as phoria. (I may have eye problems but my vocabulary is increasing by leaps and bounds.)
I've had several eye problems, too; learning about them is how I acquired my technical vocabulary. I hope your cataract surgery goes as well as mine did. My results exceeded my expectations; not being myopic has really been an (unanticipated) gift. Best wishes.
I have another thought about about your targeting a modified monovision correction with IOLs; then I promise to stop overwhelming you with additional information. At this point in time, it's unknown what your vision will be like post retinal surgery. (The literature says that vision generally improves by about two lines on the eye chart, although the affected eye may always have some residual distortion.) By chosing (modified) monovision, you would not have the benefit of letting your "good" eye compensate for any impairment in vision in your affected eye. (This ability to compensate is the advantage of having both eyes corrected to the same target.) This is something that you might want to discuss with your doctors before making a decision.
I really appreciate your encouragement, Jodie, and the information about compensation by a good eye. It's very kind and generous of you to take the time to send me these messages. As you probably can tell, I'm trying to be calm and logical but am feeling quite anxious and uncertain. It must be the same for many of the people who post on this site. - trying to make decisions about such a small part of our anatomy, that affects our ability to function so much. If you have any further thoughts at any time, I appreciate them more than you know.
I feel that I shouldn't impose on you so much, but wondered if I could ask you some more questions. If you don't have time to answer, or not right away, I understand completely.
1. Do spherical lenses show in any way or make your eyes bulge out? I know this is a funny question but an article I read said that aspheric lenses (which are flattened on the top I think) are better for cosmetic reasons.
2. For compensation by the good eye to work, do you think I should ask the doctor about correcting both eyes to plano? Or would correcting both to -.5 be a good goal as it would allow some intermediate vision as well as this compensation? I know the amount of correction is not precisely predictable in any event - which might be another reason to aim for the same for both eyes - although I wouldn't want the poorer right eye to accidentally end up stronger.
3. With spherical lenses, is it possible that I might not need LRI to correct astigmatism of -1.5 to -.2 D? I think I recall Dr. Hagan saying that up to 1 D of astigmatism could be corrected just by the way the lens incision is made - which might leave me with quite a small amount. Also, an article mentioned that, to get the benefit of aspheric lenses, astigmatism correction must be precise, from which I'm inferring that it doesn't need to be as precise for spherical lenses. It would be nice to avoid LRI because another article mentioned that they can cause dryness which I already have from mild pterigia.
4. I'm also thinking that conventional spherical lenses might be better for me because they don't need to be centred and tilted quite as precisely as toric and aspheric lenses - so subsequent surgeries would be less likely to affect them. Does this make sense to you?
Thanks so much, Jodie. I'll talk about these things with the cataract surgeon of course but think it will help both him and me if I know a little more before I see him.
I hope that Dr. Hagan reads older threads--he's in a better position to address your questions than I am.
1) Bulging eyes??? I've never heard of this, and I've never known (or noticed) anyone who had it.
2) I think the issue of which correction would work best for you is something you should discuss with your cataract surgeon. (It might help to get input from your retinal surgeon, too.) My target for cataract surgery was -.5D, but I ended up plano. Having both eyes plano is great for driving, watching movies in the theater, and spectator sports. Otherwise, the loss of near/intermediate vision drives me crazy, and I almost always wear my progressive glasses or (sometimes) bifocal contacts. (I do have a friend who also has both eyes plano, and he wears his drug store readers less than 5% of the time.) I don't think I'd be much happier with both eyes at .5D, though. It's been three years now, but I still miss my monovision contacts.
3) I think that astigmatism between 1.5D to 2.0D would significantly affect your vision at all distances. Your cataract surgeon can advise you about this.
4) One of the aspheric lens models--I think it's the Bausch & Lomb Sofport (sp?)--is supposed to work well even if its slightly off-center and/or tilted. The patient education video at tecnisiol dot com suggests that aspheric IOLs are the best technical innovation since sliced bread. However, the few independent studies that I could find comparing conventional vs. aspheric lenses told a different story. Most people who had a different type lens in each eye couldn't tell the difference. And among those who claimed they could perceive a difference in their vision, more people preferred the conventional lens! I've heard that aspheric lenses are better at reducing glare, but who knows? Your cataract surgeon will recommend what s/he feels would work best for you.
Thank-you very much, Jodie. I really would like to have monvision too. From wearing monovision contacts, I know the power difference is ok for me but I'm sure you're right about the advantage of allowing my left eye to compensate for the right. The cataract surgeon must have been thinking of the same thing when he said before that the most he would recommend would be to stagger the power slightly.
Do you think you would have found something like -1.0 or -1.5 in both eyes more satisfactory - for more near/intermediate vision?
What type of vision correction would work best probably depends on lifestyle and what someone's used to having. In all honesty, I don't think I'd be satisfied with any single focus. Something like -1.0 to -1.25 would give you good intermediate vision and some reading ability. But you'd need glasses for many activities, including driving, reading the overhead signs at the supermaket, seeing what they're ringing up on the register, etc. Maybe your best bet would be to stagger the power slightly, as your doctor suggested. But as I said before, even if your post-surgery vision isn't ideal, it's almost certainly going to be an improvement over what you have now.
What you say makes a lot of sense, as usual. Thank-you, Jodie. I'll just try to think positive now.
Do you mind if I ask whether you are finished now with medical procedures for your eyes? Other than really missing monvision for near/intermediate vision, are you doing well with your eyes and your vision? I sure hope so.
In an email, Dr. Charles (retinal surgeon in Memphis) suggested that a second procedure involving ILM peeling might eliminate my image size difference. I consulted a couple of top retinal surgeons about it last year, both of whom advised against it. (Both seemed dismayed that I could read the 20/20 line post retinal surgery, yet I STILL wasn't happy.) So I'm not thinking of doing anything else. I wear the aniseikonia correction prescribed for me online by Dr. de Wit of the Netherlands (contact lens over glasses to decrease the image size in my affected eye). I haven't been wearing my bifocal contacts much lately; they're not that comfortable and I miss having intermediate vision.
Before cataract surgery, I was so nearsighted that I couldn't find my car without contacts/glasses, Now I can actually drive it. I hope you'll be as pleased with the results of your cataract surgery as I am. And your retinal surgery should sharpen your vision considerably.
Hello ladies, I wrote some time back about my post op cataract problems, and how the door was close on me by the surgeons after my one month, post op visit.
I found another doctor and he was very kind and felt badly for me as he DX me with Large Posterior Vitreous detachment. He gave me the name of a retina/vitreous doctor and also called him. Hubby and I went there. He confirmed the detachment and felt my frustration and sadness. He offered me surgery and told me to think about it as this could go away in months or a few years. (Second eye doctor said the same thing) I was so out of it in his office that I never asked what he would do. But, I have to say that the second and third eye doctors were God Like. They both treated us well. So unlike the first place that never told me I had this. Just wanted to update you ladies. Thanks for listening. It has been a very stressful month. I had two severe angina attacks over this that landed me in the ER room. I go for a heart cath on Monday. Vision problems can take the best out of a person. Good Luck to both of you.
Jodie, I'm glad that you were so pleased with your cataract surgery and that your retinal surgery had some positive results. I hope that, one day soon, you will come across a solution to the image size difference and also some comfortable bifocal contacts for intermediate vision. I really admire the way you have gone about finding solutions to the extent possible, and so generously help other people find them as well.
Having been severely myopic since the age of 9, I have never dreamed of trying to find my car without glasses or contacts! (I probably would have climbed into someone else's car and sat on their lap.) I'm certainly looking forward to acquiring this capability.
My very sincere thanks and best wishes to you, Jodie.
texas2step, I'm glad you are finding better medical advice for your eyes but sorry about your heart problems. Good luck to you too.
Thanks so much for the well wishes. I wish them back to you also. I am such a novice when it comes to eye terminology. The Retina specialist called me today. Can you believe and on a Saturday. He wants the right cataract removed as soon as I get over the heart woes and then he wants to see me 2 weeks after I have the rt. cataract removed. They are still concerend that i may have a tiny tear in the retina along with the PVD. If I had known or been told by the original Lasix doctor about all the post op problems that could occur, I would never of thought of having any type of eye surgery. Sress over all these mishaps can be a killer. The retina doctor said there was a bad communication problem with my first eye doctor. He should of been forthcoming and upfront with me. He was not. Wishing you three ladies "good eyesight".
I'm so glad to know that you have finally found a competent and caring doctor after your miserable experience. I'd hate for you to be left with the impression that the rude, defensive, and irresponsible attitude/behavior of your original surgeon is the norm for patient care. I hope things go well for you from now on.
Thank You, Jodie. Yes, I was beginning to think I was crazy. I truly did. Every single thing I mentioned to the first surgeon and his Techs, I was told was very normal. It was not normal. How some lasix eye doctors can do this to a patient is beyond me. What is wrong with picking up a phone and calling the patient when he and his partner have been informed of a potential problem. I needed help.
I still cannot thread a needle or read clearly. But, I am thankful for Doctor No. 2 and Doctor No. 3. God Bless Them. Have a beautiful Sunday.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.