A related discussion,
rates was started.
Good to hear ... ive been thinking about you. Be safe and rest easy now.
awesome!!! I'm so happy for you moonchild. I've been wondering about you! you are certainly lucky you got the results back so soon. I guess there was a lesson to be learned and fortunately, it only made you stronger, and more the wise. and like I said, don't beat up on yourself too badly. we've all been there, we've all be lonely and vulnerable and made mistakes. don't worry too much about the 3 month test, I wouldnt even bother. Your results are totally conclusive. right on!!
Oh, not a chance that I'll talk to him again. It's really creepy.... after I sent him the "don't bother anymore" message he was online almost nonstop for like 3 days. Even creepier, he's not been online in the last 5 days which probably means he has found someone. Too bad there's no way to warn her.
I'll do one more test when it's been 3 months since the last time, just to be absolutely certain.....
I'm so happy to hear that the results were negative. It's a positive thing and now you can move forward and look towards a better future. I hope you don't talk to that guy anymore.
Results are in. My test was negative. I'm still shaking with relief. Thank you to everyone for your replies. I plan to check back in regularly and post if I can be of help or comfort to anyone else.
To any women who find themselves back in the dating game after marrying their college boyfriends 10 or 15 years ago, I just want to say to be SO careful. It is truly a different world out here now, and you still need to be very aware and listen to what your gut tells you. My biggest regret looking back at the last few days was total shock at myself and asking myself why I didn't listen to what my intuition was telling me. When you step back into dating, really think about your vulnerability and consider how strong your boundaries are. After being married and having children, many of us have very low boundaries and have become so open. I still believe there are nice guys out there, but my advice would be to let them show you that over time. Not everybody you meet will be upfront with you, and being too trusting can be a real downfall.
I thought the chance of a man catching HIV from a one time exposure was 1-1000, and a woman is twice as likely 1-500. Is that correct?
If it's a negative result will they just tell me that over the phone? Is it a bad sign if they insist that I come in to get my results?
Any quick replies greatly appreciated...
Just meant that I think it'd be highly unlikely that he would admit to anything due to culpability. (in case I tried to sue him or something...)
Good advice for the ladies. Stay safe Moonchild.
you are so right. there is no substitute for taking the time to get to know someone's character!
What does his being an attorney have to do with it? Every profession has its share of jerks - they are no exception.
Thank you so much for your response. I guess now I just sit and wait, and think about the problems having weak boundaries in regards to men can cause. I'm worried that I have let my daughters down by my own naievete.
PS I gotta tell ya I think it's highly unlikely he would "fess up" if asked directly. Did I mention he's an attorney? ;-)
athe risk is actually 1 in 1000 from F-M and greater for a woman. If he ejaculated in you, there is a higher risk per encounter. I doubt you have contracted it, just hang in there until your results come in.
I can only tell you from a man's point of view with a known HIV woman. I was told its 1 in 100 for the man to be infected if the woman was HIV+. I don't know if the situation other way round but with him penatrating you I guess higher if he is HIV+ which you don't know.
Wait the 6 weeks get tested then on the basis of that either get tested again at 3 months or not if you hear that the guy isn't HIV+
Too bad you got snookered; I know it doesn't feel good, even leaving the health issues aside. But statistically, it is still very unlikely your partner has HIV. Despite all the hype about HIV, in most populations in the US and industrialized countries it remains rare in heterosexuals who don't use injection drugs, aren't bi, and haven't been in prison. So most likely you are OK with respect to HIV. (But if not done, it would be wise to be tested for other common STDs, like chlamydia, gonorrhea, etc. Those are much more likely than HIV.) But one thing you can do is phone him and ask if he has HIV. Most people, even ***holes like this guy, don't lie when asked directly (outside sexual situations).
1) The risk of HIV transmission for each episode of unprotected vaginal sex averages 1 in 1000. So with 12 events, your risk could be around 1% (1 in 100). It could be higher if he happened to have a new HIV infection with a high viral load; or much lower if chronically infected with a low viral load.
2) Search the archives for innumerable discussions of "time to positive HIV test". Over 90% of infected people have positive tests by 4 weeks and it approaches 100% by 6 weeks. The pending test, which undoubtedly will be negative, will be highly reassuring.
3) Despite what you have read, symptoms never are a reliable indicator of new HIV infection (and absence of symptoms never reliably indicate absence of infection). And your symptoms don't sound like HIV anyway. For more information, search for "ARS symptoms" and/or "HIV symptoms".
Good luck-- HHH, MD