Nope, no change. Still virtually no risk. EWH
Thanx doc!!!! Would your answer be different if i had told you that this man was uncurcimsized? Last question
Welcome to the Forum. I think that questions about HIV risk related to performance or receipt of oral sex are among the most common questions we see. I am sure that following reading my comments below, if your wish to verify what has been said you can find many more such discussions by just looking at other recent posts.
Bottom line, this was essentially a no risk exposure. For starters, your partner, even with over 60 partners, he is statistically unlikely to have HIV. In addition, the quoted figure for HIV risk, if one has oral sex with an infected partner is less than 1 in 10,000 and, in my estimation that is too high. Some experts state there is no risk at all from oral sex. Neither of us on this site have ever seen or reading the medical literature of a convincing instance in which HIV was passed by oral sex.
So, in answer to your specific questions:
1. No,
2. Yes, At test at one month following exposure would detect over 90% of infections which occurred a month earlier. At 8 weeks the test would detect virtually all infections. Recommendations that you should wait for 12 weeks before getting tested are overly conservative.
3. See above. Ejaculation does not change this.
4. No, it is almost certainly not the ARS. Far more likely to be a community acquired, non-STD/ non-HIV virus.
Hope this is helpful to you. Try not to worry. Take care. EWH