Just a bit of feedback on my case. I had the VQ scan done and it was all clear. My specialist is certain the problem lies with the heart. I am waiting my next appointment with a proffessional cardiologist who specialises in heart rhythims, so he might be able to shed some light on what is happening with me.
I know my specialist prior to this suggested that my cardiologist will need to do some invasive testing of the heart. I had asked him whether or not he was refering to an angiogram. He basically said that an angiogram wouldnt be necesary on an underweight 21 year old. He told me an invasive test to evaluate the chambers of the heart would be more appropriate.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but isnt that test called a Catherisation? I thought a catherisation was another name for an angiogram? He has left me confused. Whats the difference betwewen the two? Could a catherisation provide SOME information about the potential arterial plaque in my coronary arteries?
Appreciate your thoughts on this.
A VQ scan is appropriate involves two types of scans: ventilation and perfusion. The ventilation scan shows where air flows in your lungs. The perfusion scan shows where blood flows in your lungs. This test should have already been done for pulmonary embolism.
I can tell from experience in the medical insurance field and acturial evaluation involving claims' adjustment that if there is not a comprehensive diagnosis for pulmonary embolism, the doctor would be vulnerable for adverse action against his/her medical license for malpractice. Your doctor is probably following the proper protocol for an analysis as it relates to your symptoms and signs.
Regarding an angiogram subsequent to the doctor's workup would depend on the analysis of the doctor for your condition and whether or not an angiogram is a test that would be appropriate based on your doctor's findiing. The test needs to be justified for payment from the insurance view point. If you pay for an angiogram, you could have an angiogram, yes.
The other invasive tests other than cath angiogram, would be esophogeal ultra sound that would view your heart from a different angle or there can be a biopsy.
You can have a non-invasive CT scan angiogram rather than the cath angiogram that is invasive.
Hope this helps, Thanks for the response and questions. Take care..
.
Hi Kenkeith, i have noticed that you have responded to almost all of my questions about what i am going through, I want to personally thank you for taking an interest because at this time, i am feeling very alone, as even my family wont take me seriously anymore.
Anyway, the PE test i have been requested to have is called a VQ Scan. I am only considering it because my cardiologist asked my lung specialist to have it done before he begins some 'invasive' testing on my heart itself.
My lung specialist is almost certain that it will come back negative, but wants me to have it anyway. I think i will get it done soon.
I am still concerned that all of my symptoms may be connected to a blocked coronary artery. Only because of the pain crushing pain on exertion. I know i am young, and against all risk factors, and this gives docs more of a reason to disregard me.
When my Lung specialist said, your cardiologist wants to do some 'invasive' testing on the heart, i thought he ment an angiogram, and at that time i was sort of relieved in a sence that i could finally put down the pain that i experience on exertion to my coronary arteries or not, but when i asked him about what sort of invasive testing he might do, he said that a coronary angiogram would be out of the question... I am confused? what other invasive tests can be performed on the heart to check for chest pain and undiagnosable heart palpiations?
If worst comes to worse, and i end up having these tests and nothing comes back at all, can i possibly request an angiogram if i really want to? or is it ultimately the cardiolgists call wheteher or not he sends me for one?
Appreciate your feedback, and god bless.
You have had a cardiopulonary test, and now your doctor wants to do test to evaluate if there any pulmonary blood clots. The CPET is the only test that can simultaneously determine which of these systems is causing the problem. Not only can the CPET determine if the problem is in the heart, lungs or muscles, but it can specifically detect the following conditions:
Heart condition that should have been ruled out and that includes congested heart failure. Diastolic and systolic heart failure. Myocardial Ischemia coronary blockage, reduced blood flow to one or more parts of the heart due to blockage or spasm, and heart valve integrity. Blockage of either the large blood vessels or small blood vessels can be detected by CPET.
Pulmonary circulation disorder – Inability of the body to pull oxygen from the lungs into the bloodstream ( blood clot in lungs, pulmonary vascular disease, scarring in the lungs, heart failure). This shoud have already been done with the tests you have had! So, does the doctor want to do further testing for pulmonary embolism?
_____________________
>>>>Has a chronotropic incompetence been considered? Although several large-scale studies have established the prognostic value of the chronotropic response during exercise, the underlying mechanisms are not very clear. Chronotropic incompetence is generally believed to reflect an underlying autonomic nervous system imbalance.
Individuals with dysfunctional autonomic heart rate responses and that may be the underlying cause for a fast heart rate at the onset of your exercise. Everything else seems to have been ruled out....but a question remains and that is why hasn't embolism been ruled out?!
Hope this helps give you an insight and a perspective on your out-of-breath symptom and some relief from the worry of an undiagnosed heart condtion. Take care and if you have any follow up questons, you are welcome to respond. Take care.
They could do a lung function test. This will measure how much air you take in, and how much oxygen your body absorbs.
Rather than running, have you tried a brisk walk every day for 30 mins and seeing if the task gets easier each day? When I had a triple bypass, I told my Doctor after three months that it had stopped working. She thought I was nuts. I walked the same 30 min route every day and kept a diary or how I felt on inclines etc. I scaled the difficulty from 1-10. I had 6 different locations where I would just scribble down a number and enter it in my diary when I got home. Instead of getting easier, it became a lot harder. I gave my Doctor my diary and she then took notice and sent me for tests which confirmed my fears. I believe she had no choice because I produced evidence and it wasn't worth risking her job by ignoring me. Maybe over several days you will improve, maybe stay the same, maybe get worse, but it's worth the investigation.