I am 54 and female - father died at 57 from myocardial infarction in 1979 - had been on medication for heart murmur believed to have been brought on by rheumatic fever he had as a child; brother has cardiomyopathy at 42 (diagnosed this year); 3 sisters with no known heart disease; mother is 77 and recent stress tests and carotid doppler all fine. My recent EKGs (last 5 years) show different abnormalities, but cardiac specialist considers false positives due to echocardiogram and nuclear stress tests results (holter test and stress done 5 years ago - all ok then and the above tests were performed in May this year). I run on the treadmill 3-5 days per week (depending on my schedule) up to 5.5 mph with no problems. My only symptom is heart palpitations if I have caffeine - try to avoid it most of the time. Now, on the recent tests mentioned above, I had two different ejection fractions. The echo fraction was 57% and the nuclear was 71%. The doctor did not explain anything other than to say my heart was normal in size, normal function with no blockages. Once I read through copies of the test results for myself - I am ok with most everything except the difference in the ejection fractions - and naturally am a little concerned with the echo percentage. Results also showed trace insufficiency in mitral and tricuspid valves, which I understood is not necessarily something to be concerned with. What do you think - why such a difference in the fraction results and what do you think about the valve insufficiency?