My Son may have a hairline fracture of a cervical vertebrae
2 weeks ago my 15 year old son suffered a concussion while playing football (linebacker). When we reviewed the dvd, we discovered he played a whole quarter after the initial injury. He had no memory of that quarter or the injury. The trainer said he should be all right. He still had a really bad headache the next day, so I took him to the ER. They said it sounded like a concussion, but since he never lost consciousness, there was no need for any xrays or ct scans. Over the next 2 weeks he continued to suffer from severe headaches that came and went. I took him to see a neurospecialist. This doctor noticed he was keeping his neck stiff and that if he puched on a certain spot, he could trigger the headache. He gave him a shot of Lidocaine in his never so it could move easier and said I should get some x-rays. I took him to get x-rays and our family doctor thinks he sees a hairline fracture in one of his vertebrae in his neck. No separation. We won't know until tomorrow what the radiologist thinks. My question is should I get him in to see a specialist and if so, what kind. His doctor says since it isn't separated, it should heal fine. Should my son be in a neck brace? Could his body have been protecting the injury by making his neck stiff and could he possibly be in danger now since he has had that shot of lidocaine to free up his neck? We are flying across the country in 2 days for a funeral, should I have any concerns about the flight?
A common complication of such an incident is what is called a subluxation injury.
This is common in an automoble accident after so-called "whiplash".
Essentially, the vertebra, which are "stacked" on top of one another, become misalligned.
Hopefully this will not be the case.
The symptoms of such an injury usually show up from eight months to two years after the incident and legally, connecting the two can be difficult. The misalignment results in numbess and pain, typically of the arm and shoulder, but sometimes extending to the hand. Because of the pain, the patient "self-splints" and the range of motion is gradually restricted until they end up with a "frozen shoulder". The pain can be excruciating. Treatment is generally by manipulation through the range of pain, anti-inflammatories and axial traction.
Because there are possible (hopefully there will be none) life-long problems documention of the injury and consultation with an attorney at the earliest stages is necessary. You need to obtain copies of all medical records and physician's reports as soon as possible.
Obtaining depositions (or simple statements, the names of witnesses, and preferably a videotape) of the game should be obtained as soon as possible. A year from now nobody will remember anything, and the school board will state "nothing ever happened". It is important that you notify your medical insurance company that there is a potential tort and that the school has liability. If the bills go on the schools tab, you won't have your insurance rates raised (as is the case with some policies when you make a claim).
The tort liability exists because your son was permitted to continue in the game after an injury. That is a violation of the doctrine of the "reasonable and prudent man".
Now this is a litigenous society, and I am not recommending a frivolous tort. I am saying that there is a possibility (and only that) of a lifetime of pain, and the way the world works is that in such a case compensation is commonly awarded.
Treatment of the "hairline fracture" generally involves temporary immobilization. Theree are pro's and cons to a cervical collar. A collar can exert traction, which is contraindicated in the healing stages (it tends to pull the bone apart). At a local health food store get some so-called "bone tea" which is a thousand year old treatment.
Later in the game, if pain develops after the break has healed, axial traction may be helpful.
Certainly for the next few months, or a year, no sport activity that may result in a blow to the head (and sudden neck flexure) should be considered.
A CT scan is inappropriate (too much radiation) and obsolete. An MRI is the appropriate diagnostic tool. I am dismayed that a specialist "ordered some x-rays". X-rays show ungotz. X-rays were the appropriate diagnostic method in 1933. Having a radiologist "look at the films" is absurd. Upon suspician of a hairline fracture an immediate MRI should have been ordered without furthur ado.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.