I don't agree at all. There was actually another discussion like this a week or so ago where the majority said it was a normal thing to do and some women had painted their newborns nails at a week old. If you wanna do it, you're the mom but I won't be
I painted my daughter's toe nails lime green at 2 months. They were so cute! There's nothing wrong with it because she far from being able to suck on her toe nails yet. I just don't paint her fingernails.
my little girl is 3 now. She loves getting her hair and nails done with me. Well I'll paint her nails lol She'll actually set very still well I do her hair. When I'm done she'll look in the mirror and shower daddy its so cute
The baby was probably knocked out that's the best way my sis could do her kids hair lol
I have no idea how she could get the baby to sit still Lon enough for it to paint and dry. I can't even paint my own nails because I have to tend to my 15 month old ths ts constantly getting into everything lol
Too soon ithink 4 is good for fingernails painted
When my girls were little, I would only do their toes.
They have non toxic nail polish made for kids! I got some for my aunt when she had my cousin!
I find it wrong. A 9 month old baby a) does not have a choice, b) the smell of nail polish is toxic and c) what happens whrn the baby decides so suck its fingers and the polish chips off?? Sorry but I find it really wrong.
I think it's cute but at that age I wouldn't only because they always have their hands in their mouth. But once she's like two it cool little girls like that stuff!
I don't see anything wrong with it
I think I'll do it once my baby is like two yrs old, and we can have a mommy daughter thing going on. They make non toxic paint for babies it's called piggy paint. But I honestly wouldn't do it to my 4 month old lol
I don't think there's anything wrong with it personally. Especially at that age. Closer to a newborn I wouldn't think that would be good for them