Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

Understanding the Gleason Score and Margins after surgery

1. Is a Gleason Score (=8) the same from day one?
2. Would the margins after surgery differ base on how long you waited to have the surgery after it was first detected?
3. If there is no trace of cancer in the lymph nodes(after prostate was removed) then how long does the cancer  residue
   remains stay in the prostate area( before they spread to some other place) if the margins were positive? In other words;
   how long should you wait before seeking adjuvant therapy?  
2 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
242579 tn?1252111171
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
Thank you for your question.

In addressing your inquiries, please restate question #1. It is not clear what you mean by "day one."

"Would the margins after surgery differ base on how long you waited to have the surgery after it was first detected?"
You would not expect a marked difference in the probability of positive surgical margins within 2-4 months after biopsy. There is one, or several, caveats. This would be hard to predict given the positive predictive value of biopsy and the discordance between imaging and final pathology. That is to say, given all the preoperative workup, it is often a challenge to correlate clinical findings with surgical realities.

"How long should you wait before seeking adjuvant therapy?"
Depending on the findings of surgical pathology, often times you would wait until PSA levels begin to rise consistently to start adjuvant therapy (assuming a negative surgical margin). The extent and location of a positive margin, the gleason grade, would determine if (after continence is regained) radiation is warranted.

Consultation with your urologist is essential to determine a followup regimen.

Ashutosh (Ash) K. Tewari, MD
www.cornellroboticprostate.org

This forum is for information only. The contents, such as graphics, images, text, quoted information and all other materials ("Content") are provided for reference only, do not claim to be complete or exhaustive or to be applicable to any particular individual's medical condition. Users should always consult with a qualified and licensed physician or other medical care provider. Users are warned to follow the advice of their physicians without delay regardless of anything read in this forum. The Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute assumes no duty to correct or update the Content nor to resolve or clarify any inconsistent information which may be a part of the Content. Reliance on any Content is solely at the User's risk. This forum may contain health or medically related materials considered sexually explicit. Users are warned that if they may be offended by such Content, an alternate source of information should be found. Publication of information or reference in forum to specific sources such as specific products, procedures, physicians, treatments, or diagnoses are for information only and are not endorsements of the Weill Cornell Prostate Cancer Institute.
Helpful - 1
Avatar universal
After looking at the  definition of a Gleason score ; I do agree with you that question one was stated incorrectly and base on that ; it  should be ignored. Thank for you for your answers.
Helpful - 0

You are reading content posted in the Prostate Cancer Forum

Popular Resources
A report from Missouri Medicine argues that, despite earlier media coverage, increased omega-3 fatty acid intake does not increase prostate cancer risk.
They got it all wrong: Why the PSA test is imperative for saving lives from prostate cancer
Get the facts about this disease that affects more than 240,000 men each year.
10 prostate cancer misconceptions debunked.
Diet and digestion have more to do with cancer prevention than you may realize
A list of national and international resources and hotlines to help connect you to needed health and medical services.