Aa
STDs' symptoms and its effects later
Hello!
Straight to my question about STDs' symptoms and its effects later regarding an insertive one of oral sex.
If someone had one of STDs' symptoms and in particular such as one of (NGU or gonorrhea)'s symptoms and at the same time he didn't know about that and also he didn't test for that , then should these symptoms leave a noticed effect on his body or his penis later {ex. 3 months later from the same exposure "I meant after finishing the known period of appearing (NGU or gonorrhea)'s symptoms"} which make him feels clearly that he has one of NGU or gonorrhea?
Thanks.
Straight to my question about STDs' symptoms and its effects later regarding an insertive one of oral sex.
If someone had one of STDs' symptoms and in particular such as one of (NGU or gonorrhea)'s symptoms and at the same time he didn't know about that and also he didn't test for that , then should these symptoms leave a noticed effect on his body or his penis later {ex. 3 months later from the same exposure "I meant after finishing the known period of appearing (NGU or gonorrhea)'s symptoms"} which make him feels clearly that he has one of NGU or gonorrhea?
Thanks.
Hi.
First, thank you..
But really you made me a worried one, when you said first you shouldn't have any WBC in urine, "no site in the world says that" you can check it up from the most famouse sites in the world such as "Lab tests online" and other sites. and later you said WBC less than 10 it is Ok, and then you said less 10 without sympotoms need no treat so you made me confused. but when I went to lab where I did urine test for all of gonorrhea and Chlamydia, and NGU, he asked me to do first stream catch to diagnose NGU correctly and then he said me WBC up to 5 it is considered as an acceaptable universal case, but WBC more than 10 then a culture test should be done to know what the main cause of that (NGU or UTI).
And culture test should have been done in all cases to check up of all the tests which I asked about, and in particular as for both of gonorrhea and Chlamydia, because as you know without cultuer test then we couldn't diagnosing gonorrhea and Chlamydia and then know thier result.
By the way lab said, "he has a master's degree in diagnosing" urine test isn't as good indicator to diagnose NGU correctly, as Dr. HHH said. and Stephen said from"Urology Experts"also by the way we can diagnose WBC if have link with NGU or any seaual action or not, during its color ,shape, size, and if were gleety or not and others things , and he assuered that I have never ever NGU, but I have a slight of UTI, so lab said culture test should be done to assuer that and to know what the main casue of WBC10-12 and also to check up of gonorrhea and Chlamydia,"as for gonorrhea and Chlamydia I had wait a full three days to take results and as for to diagnose what the main casue of WBC10-12 I had to wait a full two days"
That is a long subject but you can check it up from famosue site such as "Lab tests online"
So as for gonorrhea and Chlamydia, they were negative.
As for NGU, nothing at all refer to that before and after cultuer test.and in particualr as you know almost NGU caused by Chlamydia and I have no sympotoms of that and the most important thing that the growth was the growth of Strepto. Pyogenes. Colonies count 100.000/ml.. not refer to NGU at all., but probably refer to a slight of UTI.
As for UTI, lab said I have to do again a mid-stream catch clean, becasue the growth of Strepto. 100.000 refer to either a slight UTI or nothing dangerouse because I didn't clean the tip of penis.
and in all cases that growth of Strepto also maybe refers to effect outside of penis skin.
and other results such as Ca.Oxalate++ and Mucus++++, that becasue of the main casue "Fasting month if you know it, that deydration is, lack of drinking water is"and I was taking Vitamine C, not pills, I was taking ascrobic acid 1000mg "pill which put into water to melt", that casue Ca.oxalate. and as for RBC3/5 and EP4-6.cells also that is a normal case, but as for Ep.cells it is better to find them (0), but also up to 10 is ok. and generally none of them refer to dangerouse case.
I know I am fine and free from everything regarding all STDs. from that exposure from that year ago.
and also you know all my story, I am free from everything.
1) I understood from you that urien sample has no effect on the gonorrhea and chalmida results, if it was taken in a right way or a wrong way. do u agree?
2) I know that I tested negative HSV-2 buy IGg after 87 days and no sympotoms till now "more one year ago"and it is tiny chance to get HSV2 or even 1 from oral sex, but do you agree with me and others if I have HSV-1 from that exposure then I have a developed sympotoms on my penis and body? then should I test for it.
Or should I tset for it in all case?
3)Lab said me we do sexual herpes test in generall, so does that mean both of HSV1-and 2? or which kind of test that was?
thanks a lot
First, thank you..
But really you made me a worried one, when you said first you shouldn't have any WBC in urine, "no site in the world says that" you can check it up from the most famouse sites in the world such as "Lab tests online" and other sites. and later you said WBC less than 10 it is Ok, and then you said less 10 without sympotoms need no treat so you made me confused. but when I went to lab where I did urine test for all of gonorrhea and Chlamydia, and NGU, he asked me to do first stream catch to diagnose NGU correctly and then he said me WBC up to 5 it is considered as an acceaptable universal case, but WBC more than 10 then a culture test should be done to know what the main cause of that (NGU or UTI).
And culture test should have been done in all cases to check up of all the tests which I asked about, and in particular as for both of gonorrhea and Chlamydia, because as you know without cultuer test then we couldn't diagnosing gonorrhea and Chlamydia and then know thier result.
By the way lab said, "he has a master's degree in diagnosing" urine test isn't as good indicator to diagnose NGU correctly, as Dr. HHH said. and Stephen said from"Urology Experts"also by the way we can diagnose WBC if have link with NGU or any seaual action or not, during its color ,shape, size, and if were gleety or not and others things , and he assuered that I have never ever NGU, but I have a slight of UTI, so lab said culture test should be done to assuer that and to know what the main casue of WBC10-12 and also to check up of gonorrhea and Chlamydia,"as for gonorrhea and Chlamydia I had wait a full three days to take results and as for to diagnose what the main casue of WBC10-12 I had to wait a full two days"
That is a long subject but you can check it up from famosue site such as "Lab tests online"
So as for gonorrhea and Chlamydia, they were negative.
As for NGU, nothing at all refer to that before and after cultuer test.and in particualr as you know almost NGU caused by Chlamydia and I have no sympotoms of that and the most important thing that the growth was the growth of Strepto. Pyogenes. Colonies count 100.000/ml.. not refer to NGU at all., but probably refer to a slight of UTI.
As for UTI, lab said I have to do again a mid-stream catch clean, becasue the growth of Strepto. 100.000 refer to either a slight UTI or nothing dangerouse because I didn't clean the tip of penis.
and in all cases that growth of Strepto also maybe refers to effect outside of penis skin.
and other results such as Ca.Oxalate++ and Mucus++++, that becasue of the main casue "Fasting month if you know it, that deydration is, lack of drinking water is"and I was taking Vitamine C, not pills, I was taking ascrobic acid 1000mg "pill which put into water to melt", that casue Ca.oxalate. and as for RBC3/5 and EP4-6.cells also that is a normal case, but as for Ep.cells it is better to find them (0), but also up to 10 is ok. and generally none of them refer to dangerouse case.
I know I am fine and free from everything regarding all STDs. from that exposure from that year ago.
and also you know all my story, I am free from everything.
1) I understood from you that urien sample has no effect on the gonorrhea and chalmida results, if it was taken in a right way or a wrong way. do u agree?
2) I know that I tested negative HSV-2 buy IGg after 87 days and no sympotoms till now "more one year ago"and it is tiny chance to get HSV2 or even 1 from oral sex, but do you agree with me and others if I have HSV-1 from that exposure then I have a developed sympotoms on my penis and body? then should I test for it.
Or should I tset for it in all case?
3)Lab said me we do sexual herpes test in generall, so does that mean both of HSV1-and 2? or which kind of test that was?
thanks a lot
COMMUNITY LEADER
I was trying to say that it wasn't taken the wrong way. If you are looking for a urinary tract infection, you do a mid-stream clean catch.
If you are looking for NGU or other stds, you do a first stream catch.
You are fine.
Aj
If you are looking for NGU or other stds, you do a first stream catch.
You are fine.
Aj
Really thank a lot, but :
I tested a negative for both of gonorrhea and Chlamydia.
results were:
Culture and sensitivity tests regarding both of gonorrhea and Chlamydia, both of them were found negative, "I had to wait a full three days to take these results".
Specimen: URETHRAL CULTUER
Growth of: No Growth Of Ordinary Bacteria Aft. Colonies count: _______
Direct Exam.
Direct Exam: NOT found Chlamydia.
Microscopic examination of bacteria after coloration: NOT found any complementary diplococcuc.
If we considering which the urine sample was taken in a wrong way, then should that effect on negative results for both of (gonorrhea and Chlamydia)? I meant can I rely on negative results regarding gonorrhea and Chlamydia conclusively and definitively regardless of the urine sample was taken in a wrong way or not and then regardless of the initial urine test "Urine and Microscopic examination" was wrong because of that or right?
Thanks a lot.
I tested a negative for both of gonorrhea and Chlamydia.
results were:
Culture and sensitivity tests regarding both of gonorrhea and Chlamydia, both of them were found negative, "I had to wait a full three days to take these results".
Specimen: URETHRAL CULTUER
Growth of: No Growth Of Ordinary Bacteria Aft. Colonies count: _______
Direct Exam.
Direct Exam: NOT found Chlamydia.
Microscopic examination of bacteria after coloration: NOT found any complementary diplococcuc.
If we considering which the urine sample was taken in a wrong way, then should that effect on negative results for both of (gonorrhea and Chlamydia)? I meant can I rely on negative results regarding gonorrhea and Chlamydia conclusively and definitively regardless of the urine sample was taken in a wrong way or not and then regardless of the initial urine test "Urine and Microscopic examination" was wrong because of that or right?
Thanks a lot.
COMMUNITY LEADER
You lost me in there somewhere, but I can say that in the clinics I've worked in, we use(d) first stream specimens, not mid-stream, and we didn't do clean catches, which can wipe away some bacteria.
That said, 5 WBC isn't usually used to diagnose by itself. If you had more than 10, you'd get a definite diagnosis, but most places won't treat under 10 unless you are symptomatic.
Its sounding like you don't have anything, and its time to let this go.
Aj
That said, 5 WBC isn't usually used to diagnose by itself. If you had more than 10, you'd get a definite diagnosis, but most places won't treat under 10 unless you are symptomatic.
Its sounding like you don't have anything, and its time to let this go.
Aj
Dear friends,
I need a professional answer.
Everything was going ok with me from that exposure once I read that. That said, to get the most an accurate results regarding gonorrhea, Chlamydia and NGU, then I should test by urine.
I tested for each of gonorrhea, Chlamydia and NGU by urine test.
And as we know, the urine test contains three parts:
Physical, chemical, and Microscopic examination.
Now I am going to talk about WBC, because some people "not experts" diagnose appearing of WBC and in particular more than 5/field as NGU.
But STD's Experts from Medhelp.org said urine test is not a significant indicator to diagnose NGU correctly through account of WBC. Also I read from Urology experts' forum from Medhelp.org that they said to get an accurate results, so you should do a mid-stream clean catch urine.
However let us take the worst say, that appearing of WBC and in particular more than 5, then NGU is or at least UTI is.
But if someone has WBC more than 5/field, and during the microscopic examination was found no sing and no link to NGU "Dr knows that according to its specifications such as color, size, shape, gleety or not, and etc…however", then it probably would be UTI or even nothing at all "because of a wrong way of collecting urine sample such as urine sample wasn't taken as mid-stream clean catch urine", so the culture and sensitivity test should be done in all cases to diagnose what the main cause of that, and then to assure what the main cause was? And also the culture and sensitivity test should be done to check up of both of gonorrhea, Chlamydia accurately.
My urine sample wasn't taken as mid-stream clean catch urine. "Lab asked me to take the fist portion of urination to diagnose NGU correctly", but what is more that I didn't clean the tip of penis, because I didn't know that.
However my question is:
If we considering which the urine sample was taken in a wrong way, then should that effect on negative results for both of (gonorrhea and Chlamydia)? I meant can I rely on negative results regarding gonorrhea and Chlamydia conclusively and definitively regardless of the urine sample was taken in a wrong way or not and then regardless of the initial urine test "Urine and Microscopic examination" was wrong because of that or right?
Thanks a lot.
I need a professional answer.
Everything was going ok with me from that exposure once I read that. That said, to get the most an accurate results regarding gonorrhea, Chlamydia and NGU, then I should test by urine.
I tested for each of gonorrhea, Chlamydia and NGU by urine test.
And as we know, the urine test contains three parts:
Physical, chemical, and Microscopic examination.
Now I am going to talk about WBC, because some people "not experts" diagnose appearing of WBC and in particular more than 5/field as NGU.
But STD's Experts from Medhelp.org said urine test is not a significant indicator to diagnose NGU correctly through account of WBC. Also I read from Urology experts' forum from Medhelp.org that they said to get an accurate results, so you should do a mid-stream clean catch urine.
However let us take the worst say, that appearing of WBC and in particular more than 5, then NGU is or at least UTI is.
But if someone has WBC more than 5/field, and during the microscopic examination was found no sing and no link to NGU "Dr knows that according to its specifications such as color, size, shape, gleety or not, and etc…however", then it probably would be UTI or even nothing at all "because of a wrong way of collecting urine sample such as urine sample wasn't taken as mid-stream clean catch urine", so the culture and sensitivity test should be done in all cases to diagnose what the main cause of that, and then to assure what the main cause was? And also the culture and sensitivity test should be done to check up of both of gonorrhea, Chlamydia accurately.
My urine sample wasn't taken as mid-stream clean catch urine. "Lab asked me to take the fist portion of urination to diagnose NGU correctly", but what is more that I didn't clean the tip of penis, because I didn't know that.
However my question is:
If we considering which the urine sample was taken in a wrong way, then should that effect on negative results for both of (gonorrhea and Chlamydia)? I meant can I rely on negative results regarding gonorrhea and Chlamydia conclusively and definitively regardless of the urine sample was taken in a wrong way or not and then regardless of the initial urine test "Urine and Microscopic examination" was wrong because of that or right?
Thanks a lot.
Have an Answer?
You are reading content posted in the STDs / STIs Community
Herpes spreads by oral, vaginal and anal sex.
Herpes sores blister, then burst, scab and heal.
STIs are the most common cause of genital sores.
Millions of people are diagnosed with STDs in the U.S. each year.
STDs can't be transmitted by casual contact, like hugging or touching.
Syphilis is an STD that is transmitted by oral, genital and anal sex.
